J. Prescott

Experimental and Cognitive Psychology · Food Quality and Preference · 2001–2018

A researcher in the Science corpus: 11 papers; trusts 5 researchers and is trusted by 5 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Experimental and Cognitive Psychology — 30 citations into it; #5,562 of 9,731 by trust here, #3,963 by citations
• Nutrition and Dietetics — 30 citations into it; #410 of 1,029 by trust here, #379 by citations
• Sensory Systems — 29 citations into it; #448 of 760 by trust here, #347 by citations
• Cognitive Neuroscience — 13 citations into it

Whom J. Prescott trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. L. Nordgren
2. Dana M. Small
3. J. de Houwer
4. A. Dijksterhuis
5. Anne Treisman
6. Gemma A. Calvert
7. E. T. Rolls
8. Charles Spence

Who trusts J. Prescott overall

1. S. Dara
2. Charles Spence
3. Betina Piqueras-Fiszman

Papers from J. Prescott's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers J. Prescott trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. Changes in brain activity related to eating chocolate: from pleasure to aversion. (Brain : a journal of neurology)
2. Modulation of human visual cortex by crossmodal spatial attention. (Science)
3. Crossmodal processing in the human brain: insights from functional neuroimaging studies. (Cerebral Cortex)
4. Dissociation of neural representation of intensity and affective valuation in human gustation. (Neuron)
5. Neural responses during anticipation of a primary taste reward. (Neuron)
6. Different representations of pleasant and unpleasant odours in the human brain (European Journal of Neuroscience)
7. Taste‐olfactory convergence, and the representation of the pleasantness of flavour, in the human brain (European Journal of Neuroscience)
8. Representation of pleasant and aversive taste in the human brain. (Journal of Neurophysiology)
9. Solutions to the binding problem: progress through controversy and convergence.
10. A cortical representation of the local visual environment

Their papers

• Associations between food neophobia and responsiveness to “warning” chemosensory sensations in food products in a large population sample (2018) — 118 citations
• The influence of psychological traits, beliefs and taste responsiveness on implicit attitudes toward plant- and animal-based dishes among vegetarians, flexitarians and omnivores (2018) — 135 citations
• Personality traits and gender influence liking and choice of food pungency (2018) — 100 citations
• Emotional responses to branded and unbranded foods (2015) — 160 citations
• Multisensory processes in flavour perception and their influence on food choice (2015) — 164 citations
• The Influence of Color and Label Information on Flavor Perception (2009) — 164 citations
• Odor/taste integration and the perception of flavor (2005) — 659 citations
• Estimating a “consumer rejection threshold” for cork taint in white wine (2005) — 180 citations
• A Comparison of the Nutritional Value, Sensory Qualities, and Food Safety of Organically and Conventionally Produced Foods (2002) — 919 citations
• Motives for food choice: a comparison of consumers from Japan, Taiwan, Malaysia and New Zealand (2002) — 440 citations
• The impact of variations in flavour compounds on meat acceptability : a comparison of Japanese and New Zealand consumers (2001) — 91 citations