Advancing relational leadership research: A dialogue among perspectives
By Mary Uhl‐Bien, S. Ospina. 2012
198 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/75e01fc3f984767fc47690b75205d8c3ec179e22
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- N. Lehmann‐Willenbrock
- Annika Luisa Meinecke
- Jens Rowold
- Simone Kauffeld
- Melissa Carsten
- Lisa A. Marchiondo
- Lei Vincent Huang
- Christopher G. Myers
Citations in the corpus
- Leader perceptions and motivation as outcomes of followership role orientation and behavior (2018, background): “A clear practical implication of our investigation is the need for organizations to pay more attention to how followers can effectively engage with managers to co-produce leadership and its outcomes (Fairhurst and Uhl-Bien, 2012; Shamir, 2007; Uhl-Bien and Ospina, 2012).”
- How transformational leadership works during team interactions: A behavioral process analysis (2015, background): “Generally speaking, leadership research should account for relationality, in terms of the dynamic social interaction between leaders and followers (Bradbury & Lichtenstein, 2000; Uhl-Bien & Ospina, 2012).”
- The Relational Nature of Leadership Identity Construction: How and When It Influences Perceived Leadership and Decision-Making (2015, background): “Indeed, relational leadership theory is an emerging perspective that underscores the socially constructed nature of leadership through interpersonal processes (Uhl-Bien, 2006), seeing leadership as emerging from complex interpersonal dynamics among members of organizations (Uhl-Bien & Ospina, 2012).”