Virtual team leadership: The effects of leadership style and communication medium on team interaction styles and outcomes

By Laura A. Hambley, Thomas A. O'Neill, Theresa J. B. Kline. 2007

406 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/718c516a02764513abe33458fe8abf8930428bcb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Leading virtual teams: hierarchical leadership, structural supports, and shared team leadership. (2014, background): “However, these forms of leader behavior have also been posited to have weaker relations for virtual teams (Hambley et al., 2007; J. M. Howell & Hall-Merenda, 1999; J. M. Howell et al., 2005).”
A Within-Person Examination of the Effects of Telework (2014, background): “Given these factors, teleworkers need to display higher levels of self-management than do employees in a traditional work arrangement and need to have a trusting relationship with their supervisor (Hambley et al. 2007; Golden and Veiga 2008).”
The Role of Leadership in a Digitalized World: A Review (2019, methodology): “Yet, the authors found mixed results in terms of the association between constructive interaction and task performance (Hambley et al., 2007).”
Team Effectiveness 1997-2007: A Review of Recent Advancements and a Glimpse Into the Future (2008, background): “In contrast, Hambley, O’Neill, and Kline (2007) investigated the role of leadership style (i.e., transformational, transactional) and failed to find any significant relationships with either style and the quality of team interactions.”
Geographic Proximity between Auditor and Client: How Does it Impact Audit Quality? (2012, neutral): “…suggest that face-to-face communication is more effective through the support for a higher level of interaction than other electronic forms of communication, such as e-mail and videoconferencing (e.g., Baltes et al. 2002; Doherty-Sneddon et al. 1997; Hambley et al. 2007; Hinds and Morensen 2005).”