As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation

By Ken Hyland. 2008

1,046 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Literature and Literary Theory

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/948336062c80d3de8843f8f1c29f631427eaee85

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. N. Schmitt
2. Ron Martinez
3. Sylviane Granger
4. Magali Paquot
5. Douglas Biber
6. Bethany Gray
7. Rita Simpson-Vlach
8. Paul Baker

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. N. Schmitt
2. Sylviane Granger
3. Magali Paquot
4. Ron Martinez
5. Paul Baker
6. Yu-Hua Chen
7. Rita Simpson-Vlach
8. Bethany Gray

In Literature and Literary Theory

1. Bethany Gray
2. Paul Baker
3. Yu-Hua Chen
4. Sylviane Granger
5. Magali Paquot
6. Douglas Biber
7. Nick C. Ellis
8. Rita Simpson-Vlach

Citations in the corpus

• An Academic Formulas List: New Methods in Phraseology Research (2010, background): “Our conclusions also stand in contrast to those of Hyland (2008) who argues that there are not enough lexical bundles common to multiple disciplines to constitute a core academic phrasal lexicon, and therefore advocates a strictly discipline-specific pedagogical approach to lexical bundles.”
• Discourse Characteristics of Writing and Speaking Task Types on the "TOEFL iBT"® Test: A Lexico-Grammatical Analysis. "TOEFL iBT"® Research Report. TOEFL iBT-19. Research Report. RR-13-04. (2013, background): “Hyland (2008) Lexical bundles Student writers employed a higher proportion of lexical bundles that outline research procedures as compared to published writers, which may be related to the nature of the student genres as a way of displaying knowledge.”
• Formulaic Language in Learner Corpora (2012, background): “…regardless of their structural status” (Biber, Johansson, Leech, Conrad, & Finegan, 1999, p. 990; e.g., as for, out of, as far as, as discussed in, take the example of, the extent to which) in various text types and genres (e.g., Biber, Conrad, & Cortes, 2004; Hyland 2008; Stubbs & Barth, 2003).”
• Lexical bundles in L1 and L2 academic writing (2010, neutral): “Working with academic writing only, Hyland (2008b) indicated that there was disciplinary variation in the use of lexical bundles.”
• Investigating Criterial Discourse Features across Second Language Development: Lexical Bundles in Rated Learner Essays, CEFR B1, B2 and C1 (2014, background): “The anticipatory it structure and prepositional bundles, on the other hand, are found to be characteristic of academic writing (Biber et al. 1999; Hyland 2008).”
• A Phrasal Expressions List (2012, background): “formulaic sequences) available to realize this need (Nattinger and DeCarrico 1992: 62–63) in all genres, including scientific and academic discourse (e.g. Biber et al. 2004; Dorgeloh and Wanner 2009; Hyland 2008; Wulff et al. 2009).”