Using the Implicit Association Test to Measure Self-Esteem and Self-Concept

By A. Greenwald, Shelly Diane Farnham. 2000

429 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/25fc3688e8abf9c05a898d9444a3af84ad3fc4d0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Bertram Gawronski
2. A. Greenwald
3. J. de Houwer
4. Mahzarin R. Banaji
5. Laurie A. Rudman
6. Michela Schröder‐Abé
7. Masaki Yuki
8. Kosuke Takemura

In Gender Studies

1. Bertram Gawronski
2. J. de Houwer
3. Wendy Wood
4. A. Eagly
5. Mahzarin R. Banaji
6. Brian A. Nosek
7. Etienne P LeBel
8. A. Greenwald

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Bertram Gawronski
2. Brian A. Nosek
3. Mahzarin R. Banaji
4. J. de Houwer
5. A. Greenwald
6. A. Eagly
7. Nilanjana Dasgupta
8. Laurie A. Rudman

Citations in the corpus

• Two Traditions of Research on Gender Identity (2015, background): “when each is paired with words indicative of communal (warm, tender) or agentic (competitive, aggressive) attributes (Greenwald and Farnham 2000).”
• Self‐esteem discrepancies and defensive reactions to social feedback (2007, methodology): “Several methods of measuring implicit SE have been proposed, but only the Name Letter Preference Task (Nuttin, 1985 ) and the Implicit Association Test (IAT; Greenwald & Farnham, 2000 ) have demonstrated satisfactory reliability and validity (Bosson, Swann, & Pennebaker, 2000 ).”
• Discrimination and the Implicit Association Test (2007, background): “Indeed, a recurrent insight from response latency measures is that people tend to automatically react with preference for similar others (as they do for themselves; Greenwald & Farnham, 2000).”
• Why do Westerners self‐enhance more than East Asians? (2009, methodology): “…in self-enhancing motivations; namely, comparisons of implicit selfesteem using the implicit associations test for self-esteem measure (IATSE; Greenwald & Farnham, 2000) did not reveal cultural differences between East Asian and North American samples (Kitayama & Uchida, 2003; Kobayashi &…”
• Children and social groups: A developmental analysis of implicit consistency in Hispanic Americans (2007, methodology): “For example, three representative studies all found average implicit self-esteem effect sizes equivalent to D4 .92 in predominately majority samples ( Greenwald & Farnham, 2000; Lane et al., 2005; Rudman, Greenwald, & McGhee, 2001).3 By contrast, the mean effect size here, collapsing”
• A COGNITIVE SKILL CONFOUND ON THE IMPLICIT ASSOCIATION TEST (2002, methodology): “1. Greenwald and Farnham (2000) deleted participants with greater than 20% error rates, so the standard for keeping participants here was more lenient.”