The Implicit Association Test at Age 7: A Methodological and Conceptual Review

By Brian A. Nosek, A. Greenwald, Mahzarin R. Banaji. 2007

1,254 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/13888d871fe7e1c097bb624d7698849a569a0339

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Understanding Implicit Bias: What Educators Should Know. (2016, background): “Millions of people have taken the IAT, and extensive research has largely upheld the IAT as a valid and reliable measure of implicit associations.(18) There are IATs that assess both attitudes (i.”
Engaging rational discrimination: exploring reasons for placing regulatory constraints on decision support systems (2010, unknown): “Public opposition to the use of 28 Nosek et al. (2006).”
On the epistemic costs of implicit bias (2011, unknown): “For discussion, see Nosek et al. (2006).”
The Best Way to Measure Explicit Racial Attitudes Is to Ask About Them (2018, methodology): “Procedure followed the design from Nosek, Greenwald, and Banaji (2007) and was scored by the D algorithm (Greenwald et al., 2003).”
Implicit (and explicit) racial attitudes barely changed during Barack Obama’s presidential campaign and early presidency (2010, background): “This finding replicates previous research (Nosek et al., 2007), with women showing less implicit race bias than men (g(2)p = .”
Getting Explicit About the Implicit (2012, methodology): “The predictive validity of the most commonly used association-based implicit measures, the IAT and priming tasks, has been confirmed across scores of laboratories (for reviews, see Fazio & Olson, 2003; Greenwald, Poehlman, et al., 2009; Nosek et al., 2007; for criticisms of two specific studies and ”
The effect of priming gender roles on women's implicit gender beliefs and career aspirations (2010, unknown): “In Parks-Stamm et al.’s (2008) research, they found that giving women bogus feedback on a management aptitude test (indicating that they, too, could succeed as a manager) eliminated the diminishing effect of a successful, atypical woman on their explicit self-efficacy.”
Economic Explanations for Opposition to Immigration: Distinguishing between Prevalence and Conditional Impact (2013, methodology): “Although the IAT is commonly used in psychological, neuroscience, and marketing research (Nosek, Greenwald, and Banaji 2007), its use in political science has been much more limited .”