Using the Implicit Association Test to investigate attitude-behaviour consistency for stigmatised behaviour

By Jane Swanson, Laurie A. Rudman, A. Greenwald. 2001

312 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Marketing, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4945ed285d3c05d1136ec096fbebc47a3bd721ce

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Bertram Gawronski
2. Wilhelm Hofmann
3. J. de Houwer
4. Manfred J. Schmitt
5. Malte Friese
6. R. Fazio
7. Tobias Gschwendner
8. Armand De Clercq

In Marketing

1. J. de Houwer
2. R. Fazio
3. Manfred J. Schmitt
4. Wilhelm Hofmann
5. Tobias Gschwendner
6. Bertram Gawronski

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Bertram Gawronski
2. J. de Houwer
3. Wilhelm Hofmann
4. Manfred J. Schmitt
5. Brian A. Nosek
6. R. Fazio
7. Malte Friese
8. Galen Bodenhausen

Citations in the corpus

• Implicit measures in social cognition. research: their meaning and use. (2003, result): “Similar differences have been obtained with respect to vegetarians and, although less consistently, with cigarette smokers (Swanson et al. 2001).”
• A Meta-Analysis on the Correlation Between the Implicit Association Test and Explicit Self-Report Measures (2005, background): “For instance, in a study by Swanson, Rudman, and Greenwald (2001), attitudes toward vegetarianism and smoking were assessed within one sample.”
• Do smokers have a negative implicit attitude toward smoking? (2006, background): “Based on studies with a standard attitude IAT, Swanson et al. (2001) concluded that smokers have negative implicit attitudes toward smoking.”