Implicit Attitude Measures: Consistency, Stability, and Convergent Validity

By William A. Cunningham, Kristopher J Preacher, Mahzarin R. Banaji. Psychology Science, 2001

976 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7f86cacf47e052c47edf51863ef634cf93e29c75

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

1. Bertram Gawronski
2. Brian A. Nosek
3. A. Greenwald
4. Malte Friese
5. Wilhelm Hofmann
6. J. de Houwer
7. Mahzarin R. Banaji
8. Laurie A. Rudman

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Bertram Gawronski
2. Brian A. Nosek
3. A. Greenwald
4. Malte Friese
5. Wilhelm Hofmann
6. Mahzarin R. Banaji
7. J. de Houwer
8. Laurie A. Rudman

Citations in the corpus

• Automatic attitudes and alcohol: Does implicit liking predict drinking? (2008, background): “This lack of correlations may reflect high measurement error among some implicit measures (Cunningham, Preacher, & Banaji, 2001 ) or method variance related to differences in the structures of the tests (Payne, Burkley, & Stokes, 2007a ).”
• Patterns and Personality Correlates of Implicit and Explicit Attitudes Toward Christians and Muslims (2005, methodology): “We selected the IAT to measure implicit attitudes toward Muslims relative to Christians because IATs are internally consistent (Banse, Seise, and Zerbes 2001), temporally reliable ( Cunningham, Preacher, and Banaji 2001 ), valid (Devine 2001; Dovidio, Kawakami, and Beach 2001; Gawronski 2002; Greenw”
• Is the Implicit Association Test a Valid and Valuable Measure of Implicit Consumer Social Cognition (2004, background): “First, IAT measures converge with semantic priming measures of association strength (Cunningham et al., 2001; Mellott & Greenwald, 2000; Rudman & Kilianski, 2000).”
• Math Male , Me Female , Therefore Math Me (2002, background): “Yet there is growing evidence to suggest that explicit and implicit measures can be positively and significantly correlated while remaining separate factors (Cunningham et al., 2001; Greenwald & Farnham, 2000).”
• The Implicit Association Test at Age 7: A Methodological and Conceptual Review (2007, background): “This extends similar findings for individual constructs such as Greenwald and Farnham (2000) for self-esteem, and Cunningham et al. (2001) for racial attitudes.”
• Implicit connections with nature (2004, background): “However, Cunningham et al. (2001) also reported a confirmatory factor analysis showing a clear higher order factor for implicit measures of prejudice, and a latent correlation coefficient of 0.”
• Mindfulness as a moderator of the effect of implicit motivational self-concept on day-to-day behavioral motivation (2007, methodology): “Further evidence for the convergent (and discriminant) validity of the IAT measure introduced here is needed, however, and with the recent advent of other reliable implicit reaction-time measures ( Cunningham et al. 2001; Nosek and Banaji 2001), research using the IAT may more easily address such v”
• TARGET ARTICLE: Attributions of Implicit Prejudice, or "Would Jesse Jackson 'Fail' the Implicit Association Test?" (2004, neutral): “The most conspicuous exception is Cunningham, Preacher, and Banaji (2001) who showed that a latent variable approach that takes measurement error into account yields a correlation of .45 between an implicit attitude latent construct and the explicit attitude construct, which puts this result toward…”