Expatriate adjustment and performance: A critical review.

By David C. Thomas, M. Lazarova. 2006

139 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/70092e5a2c91bfc5c62c477229d129e2c6d2ba96

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

Citations in the corpus

Multicultural Employees: A Framework for Understanding How They Contribute to Organizations (2013, unknown): “Despite issues in the original theory, including data-driven development and lack of validation (Thomas & Lazarova, 2005), similar three-part distinctions continue to be applied as categorical tools, even beyond purely adjustment outcomes (Thomas & Fitzsimmons, 2008).”
Elucidating the Positive Side of the Work-Family Interface on International Assignments: A Model of Expatriate Work and Family Performance (2010, unknown): “…found support for a positive link between adjustment and performance, and interpreting existing research is complicated by conceptualization and measurement issues—notably, the conceptual overlap between many “expatriate effectiveness” measures and facets of adjustment (Thomas & Lazarova, 2006).”
Theorizing the meaning(s) of ‘expatriate’: establishing boundary conditions for business expatriates (2016, background): “Despite the enormous empirical literature about expatriates, and on AEs in particular (e.g. see reviews by Andreason, 2008; Black & Mendenhall, 1990; Thomas & Lazarova, 2006), the outcome is an increasing level of conceptual confusion about the construct of business expatriates in the IHRM…”
Assessing Intercultural Competence in Higher Education: Existing Research and Future Directions (2016, methodology): “The Black and Stephens scale is commonly used, but has several measurement concerns, including proper validation evidence (Thomas & Lazarova, 2006).”
Why do female expatriates “fit‐in” better than males? (2011, background): “Criticisms of the original work by Black and colleagues notwithstanding (Hippler, 2006; Thomas and Lazarova, 2006), Black and Stephens (1989) found that work adjustment had direct positive effects on task performance, and interactional adjustment had direct positive effects on contextual…”