Defying conventional wisdom: A meta-analytical examination of the differences between demographic and job-related diversity relationships with performance

471 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Microdynamics in diverse teams: A review and integration of the diversity and stereotyping literatures (2017, background): “Indeed, the central role of moderators for the effects of team diversity has been underscored by two meta analyses (Joshi & Roh, 2009; van Dijk et al., 2012), with the latter even suggesting that the diversity beliefs of the person rating team performance moderate the diversity-outcome relationship.”
Team creativity/innovation in culturally diverse teams: A meta‐analysis (2019, background): “The diversity literature concurs that the technological factor of team virtuality and the task characteristics, such as task interdependence and complexity, are important moderators for the diversity effects (Guillaume et al., 2017; Jehn et al., 1999; van Dijk et al., 2012).”
Past, present, and potential future of team diversity research: From compositional diversity to emergent diversity (2016, background): “Part of what Guillaume et al. could do therefore was to draw on recent meta-analytical evidence by van Dijk et al. (2012) that was explicitly framed as including qualifications of the conclusions of earlier less inclusive and smaller meta-analyses (i.e., Horwitz & Horwitz, 2007; Hülsheger,…”