Individual Creativity and Group Ability to Utilize Individual Creative Resources: A Multilevel Model

By S. Taggar. 2002

855 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6f1413e45bf690000f2768a857f6a1ca183f296d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

A Multilevel Model of Team Goal Orientation, Information Exchange, and Creativity (2013, background): “…theory of creativity suggests that individual creativity is the building block for team creativity (Drazin et al., 1999) and may exert a unique bottom-up influence on it that goes above and beyond that exerted by team processes (e.g., information exchange) (Taggar, 2002; Woodman et al., 1993).”
Multilevel Research in the Field of Organizational Behavior (2013, background): “…(on the Web of Science): Academy of Management Review, the first one in the ranking (IF 5years = 11.442; Aguilera et al., 2007), the Academy of Management Journal, the second (IF 5years = 10.565; Hitt et al., 2007; Liao & Chuang, 2004; Taggar, 2002), and the Mis Quarterly, the third in the Table 2.”
THE ROLE OF CREATIVITY IN ENTREPRENEURSHIP (2010, background): “Dr Ian Fillis, University of Stirling, Scotland Professor Ruth Rentschler, Deakin University, Australia”
Duality in Diversity: How Intrapersonal and Interpersonal Cultural Heterogeneity Relate to Firm Performance (2019, background): “Creative recombination is ultimately something that individuals do (Amabile, 1988; Sauermann and Cohen, 2010), although organizations create contexts that can facilitate or inhibit this creativity (Amabile et al., 1996; Taggar, 2002).”
Transformational leadership, innovative work behavior, and employee well-being (2013, background): “…of psychological safety (Edmondson 1999; Lipshitz et al. 2007), openness to diversity of opinions (Baker and Sinkula 1999; Hurley and Hult 1998; Tagger 2002; Woodman et al. 1993; Yang 2003), and participation in decision making (Hedberg 1981; Hurley and Hult 1998; Thompson and Kahnweiler 2002).”
Organizational innovativeness: : Construct development and cross-cultural validation (2014, background): “For example, Hurley and Hult (1998) defined innovativeness in terms of “openness to new ideas as an aspect of a firm’s culture” (p. 44), and Taggar (2002) argued for and documented “a positive association between openness to experience and creativity processes, as measured by group member behavior”…”
Motivational mechanisms of employee creativity: A meta-analytic examination and theoretical extension of the creativity literature (2016, positive): “…Self 393 .88 .19/.82 Sun, Zhang, Qi, and Chen (2012) Non-self 385 .79 .52/.87 .17/.95 Sung and Choi (2009) Self 304 .81 .09/.61 .26/.75 .03/.75 .11/.61 Taggar (2002) Non-self 480 .82 .41/.71 .17/.72 .19/.82 Tamannaeifar and Motaghedifard (2014) Self 355 .66 .34/.81 Tierney and Farmer (2002)…”
The Effect of Conformist and Attentive-To-Detail Members on Team Innovation: Reconciling the Innovation Paradox (2011, background): “By focusing on generating ideas and revealing new problems and solutions, creative members provide their teams with diverse knowledge and a large pool of ideas from which to choose (Taggar, 2001, 2002).”