Ethical Judgment and Whistleblowing Intention: Examining the Moderating Role of Locus of Control

By R. Chiu. 2003

348 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6e6182a146801b167d2dee6320f2563156c81e81

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems and Management

Citations in the corpus

Wrongdoing by Consultants: An Examination of Employees’ Reporting Intentions (2005, background): “Recent whistleblowing research has examined the role of national culture (Chiu, 2003; Tavakoli et al., 2003), the role of laws and corporate culture/structure (Baynes, 2002; Callahan et al., 2002; Dworkin and Near, 1997; King, 1999; Near and Dworkin,1998), whistleblowers’ perceptions that the…”
Ethical Leadership and Internal Whistleblowing: A Mediated Moderation Model (2017, background): “These include one’s locus of control (Chiu 2003), self-efficacy (MacNab and Worthley 2008), and Machiavellianism (Dalton and Radtke 2013).”
The psychology of whistleblowing (2015, background): “Moreover, people who feel an internal locus of control, thereby taking on more responsibility for their behaviors, are more likely to report positive intentions to blow the whistle [17].”
Predictors, consequence, and measurement of ethical judgments: Review and meta-analysis (2012, background): “All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.02.002 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Business Research age and strictness of ethical judgments to be positive (Chiu, 2003; Peterson et al., 2001; Vitell and Paolillo, 2003).”
Ethical Awareness, Ethical Judgment and Whistleblowing: A Moderated Mediation Analysis (2017, background): “Previous research has shown that ethical judgment has a positive influence on whistleblowing intentions (Zhang et al. 2009; Chiu 2003) and is moderated by moral intensity (Alleyne et al. 2013; Latan et al. 2016).”
From Inaction to External Whistleblowing: The Influence of the Ethical Culture of Organizations on Employee Responses to Observed Wrongdoing (2009, methodology): “…control variables of gender, tenure and age used in the present study, factors such as educational level (Near & Miceli, 1995), religiosity and ethical ideology (Barnett, Bass, & Brown, 1996) and ethical judgment (Chiu, 2003) have also been found to be relevant in explaining whistleblowing.”
Determinants of Whistleblowing Within Government Agencies (2015, background): “Existing studies have also argued that whistleblowing makes organizations more transparent and accountable (Apaza & Chang, 2011; Chiu, 2003; Jos, 1991; Keenan, 1990; Keil, Tiwana, Sainsbury, & Sneha, 2010).”
Making Sense of Whistle-Blowing's Antecedents: Learning from Research on Identity and Ethics Programs (2009, methodology): “These include Chiu's (2003) inquiry with Chinese professionals and managers, Dworkin and Baucus's (1998) research on internal versus external whistle-blowing, and Keenan (2000)'s article on whistle-blowing on less serious frauds (also see Lee et al.”
Whistleblowing in Organizations: An Examination of Correlates of Whistleblowing Intentions, Actions, and Retaliation (2005, background): “…rather than actual whistleblowers by (1) citing the difficulty of carrying out investigations into unethical conduct in actual organizations (e.g., Chiu, 2003), (2) suggesting that actual whistleblowers censor the information they provide to investigators due to the perception that data gathered…”
The whistleblower's dilemma and the fairness–loyalty tradeoff (2013, neutral): “…suggests that the United States, an individualistic country, views whistleblowing as more ethical than collectivistic countries such as Japan (Brody, Coulter, & Mihalek, 1998), China (Chiu, 2003), and Taiwan (Brody, Coulter, & Lin, 1999; see also Christie, Kwon, Stoeberl, & Baumhart, 2003).”
The effects of accounting students' ethical reasoning and personal factors on their ethical sensitivity (2006, neutral): “Ethical judgment studies examine the relationship between ethical reasoning and ethical behavior of accountants in the context of accounting and auditing (Ponemon and Gabhart, 1990; Arnold and Ponemon, 1991; Bernardi, 1991; Finn and Lampe, 1992; Ponemon, 1993, 1995; Ponemon and Gabhart, 1993; Windso”