Cultural differences in teaching and learning

By Hilary Hollingsworth. 2013

688 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6aee9293fdbb2cf42dacf49b0ae8129013472fe7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

The role of cultural dimensions of international and Dutch students on academic and social integration and academic performance in the Netherlands (2013, background): “Furthermore, we assess whether cultural dimensions, as measured by Hofstede (1986), and differences in academic and social integration between Dutch and international students actually have an impact on academic performance, as measured by grade point average scores (GPA) and European Credit…”
Understanding students' perceptions of the benefits of online social networking use for teaching and learning (2015, background): “This situation can be explained using the arguments made by Hofstede (1986) who noted cultural differences or similarities from two perspectives, namely individualism vs.”
National context and teacher characteristics: Exploring the critical non-cognitive attributes of novice teachers in four countries (2018, background): “Although research shows that some teaching practices vary across countries (e.g., McIntyre, Mainhard,& Klassen, 2017; Hofstede, 1986; Stigler, Gallimore, & Hiebert, 2000), less is known about cross-national variations in critical non-cognitive attributes (i.e., inter- and intra-personal attributes…”
Effectiveness of Transformational Leadership among Different Cultures (2020, unknown): “…and noted the cultural differences in the workplace as employee value perception, managers behaviour, consumer behaviour, and marketing related activities of organizations and customers responses according to their culture (Hofstede, 1986, 2003, 2009, 2011; Hofstede & Bond, 1984; Hassan, 2015ab).”
The beliefs that underlie autonomy-supportive and controlling teaching: A multinational investigation (2014, methodology): “…its conceptual opposite is individualism, which pertains to a cultural perspective in which the ties between individuals are looser, and it refers to norms and practices that give priority to the individual’s goals and interests (Hofstede 2001; Hofstede et al. 2010; Oyserman et al. 2002).”
Student Satisfaction, Performance, and Knowledge Construction in Online Collaborative Learning (2012, background): “The Flemish culture is situated in a western setting, which is more individualistic, while the Chinese culture, as part of the Confucian-heritage cultures, is traditionally representative of a collectivistic culture (Baron, 1998; Hofstede, 1986).”
Quiet or questioning? Students' discussion behaviors in student-centered education across cultures (2014, background): “This also applies, by implication, to the way students communicate with their peers and their teachers (Hofstede 1986).”
Understanding social learning relations of international students in a large classroom using social network analysis (2013, background): “In many “Western” universities, teachers and institutes place a lot of responsibilities on students to self-determine their learning (Hofstede, 1986; Sherry et al., 2010; Tempelaar, Rienties, Giesbers, & Schim van der Loeff, 2012).”
State of the art themes in cross-cultural communication research: A systematic and meta-analytic review (2014, background): “Power distance is “the extent to which [people] in a society accept inequality in power and consider it as normal” (Hofstede, 1986, p. 307).”
Demographic differences in how students navigate through MOOCs (2014, background): “Researchers have found that, in countries with a higher student-teacher ratio, students are more accustomed to a teacher-centered education and behave more like “observers” than “explorers” [11].”
The Relationship between Entrepreneurship Education and Entrepreneurial Intentions: A Meta–Analytic Review (2014, background): “In a high power distance society, teachers are ranked higher than students, and lessons are less likely to be arguable because students tend to avoid being critical of teachers (Hofstede, 1986, 2001; Joy & Kolb, 2009).”