Demographic differences in how students navigate through MOOCs
By Philip J. Guo, Katharina Reinecke. ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale, 2014
349 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Science Applications, Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2e6857da76999aa93240866b470ecce5dbd28bd3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Science Applications
- Ryan Shaun Joazeiro de Baker
- Z. Pardos
- Joseph Jay Williams
- René F. Kizilcec
- Fred Paas
- Mark Warschauer
- Jinhee Kim
- R. Luckin
In Education
- Mar Pérez-SanAgustín
- Jorge J. Maldonado
- Ryan Shaun Joazeiro de Baker
- Rachel B. Baker
- Joseph Jay Williams
- René F. Kizilcec
- Fred Paas
- Mark Warschauer
Citations in the corpus
- Mining Big Data in Education: Affordances and Challenges (2020, background): “These constructs often examine the learner’s ability to self-regulate learning processes (Roll & Winne, 2015), behaviors that are especially relevant in less structured systems such as LMS and MOOCs.”
- Self-regulated learning strategies predict learner behavior and goal attainment in Massive Open Online Courses (2017, background): “On the other hand, as noted here and in prior work, learners’ socio-cultural context has consequences for how they perceive and engage with online courses (e.g., Guo & Reinecke, 2014; Ogan et al., 2015).”
- Supporting Self-Regulated Learning in Online Learning Environments and MOOCs: A Systematic Review (2018, background): “Whereas ITS are deliberate in prescribing the learning sequence for learners based on their behavior and performance, MOOCs present a single path from which learners can — and frequently do (Davis, Chen, Hauff, & Houben, 2016; Guo & Reinecke, 2014) — deviate should they choose to.”