Knowledge spillovers and the assignment of R&D responsibilities to foreign subsidiaries

By S. Feinberg, Anil K. Gupta. 2004

341 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6966d6c27bd36a31565c632570a0e838031caced

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Offshoring of R&D: Looking abroad to improve innovation performance (2011, background): “MNEs also internationalize R&D to acquire knowledge and internalize technological spillovers that are host locationspecific (Feinberg & Gupta, 2004; Florida, 1997; Von Zedtwitz & Gassmann, 2002).”
The impact of distance on knowledge transfer effectiveness in multinational corporations (2009, background): “for knowledge exchange ( Feinberg and Gupta, 2004; Galunic and Rodan, 1998) and supports”
Cross-border Market Co-creation, Dynamic Capabilities and the Entrepreneurial Theory of the Multinational Enterprise (2010, background): “8 See also Feinberg and Gupta (2004) and Pitelis (2000).”
Innovation and international business (2017, background): “…competence-creating capabilities matters to the capacity of subsidiaries and indigenous firms to interact in knowledge creating activities, and hence for the presence or absence of local knowledge spillovers in either direction (Feinberg and Gupta 2004; Marin 2006; Cantwell and Piscitello 2007).”
The Reification of Absorptive Capacity: A Critical Review and Rejuvenation of the Construct (2006, background): “While the influence of most of these industry conditions on absorptive capacity has not been researched, there is some empirical support for Cohen and Levinthal’s assertion that the propensity of spillovers (particularly in the same geographical area) increases the incentive for firms to invest in R”
State Ownership and Firm Innovation in China: An Integrated View of Institutional and Efficiency Logics (2017, methodology): “We employed a Tobit analysis to deal with the non-negative nature of our dependent variables, namely, R&D intensity and new product output (Feinberg and Gupta, 2004; Salomon and Shaver, 2005).”
1 Moving Beyond Schumpeter: Management Research on the Determinants of Technological Innovation (2008, neutral): “…work of scholars in that area is omitted (for coverage of this, please see Agrawal & Cockburn, 2003; Almeida & Kogut, 1999; Chung & Alcacer, 2002; Feinberg & Gupta, 2004; Feldman, 1999; Fleming, Mingo, & Chen, 2007; Gittelman, 2007; Gupta & Govindarajan, 2000; Jaffe & Trajtenberg, 1999;…”
Asymmetry of knowledge spillovers between MNCs and host country firms (2007, result): “This is consistent with previous findings on knowledge diffusion between MNC subsidiaries (Head et al., 1995; Feinberg and Majumdar, 2001; Feinberg and Gupta, 2004).”
The Emergence of China and India as New Competitors in MNCs' Innovation Networks (2009, background): “…MNCs to access the best locations for R&D on a worldwide basis in order to profit from localised expertise, knowledge and talent resources, as well as from knowledge spillovers in regional clusters (Asheim & Gertler 2005; Doz et al. 2001; Feinberg & Gupta 2004; Kuemmerle 1999; Porter & Stern 2001).”
R&D co-practice and ‘reverse’ knowledge integration in multinational firms (2005, background): “growing body of empirical work has sought to illuminate various aspects of this alternative view (Cantwell, 1989; Almeida, 1996; Birkinshaw, 1997; Zander, 1999; Frost, 2001; Frost et al., 2002; Feinberg and Gupta, 2004).”