Dispositional factors predicting Chinese students’ critical thinking performance

111 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Measuring Critical Thinking in Physics: Development and Validation of a Critical Thinking Test in Electricity and Magnetism (2016, methodology): “Both the original and translated version of the HCTAwas validated by researchers in different countries such as the USA (Halpern, 2010), Belgium (Verburgh, François, Elen, & Janssen, 2013), and China (Ku & Ho, 2010).”
The development and psychometric validation of a Critical Thinking Disposition Scale (2013, background): “Dispositions on the other hand examine the tendency to do something (Ennis, 1996), or the manner in which individuals approach a task (Ku & Ho, 2010).”
Pedagogy for Developing Critical Thinking in Adolescents: Explicit Instruction Produces Greatest Gains. (2011, methodology): “It has been asserted that much of the mandated high-stakes testing forces teachers to overly concentrate on lower-order thinking skills (ADP, 2004; Darling-Hammond, 2004; Neill, 2003). Plitt (2004) writes that when educating low-performing high school students, adhering to state-mandated curriculum ”
Metacognitive strategies that enhance critical thinking (2010, background): “They were divided into high critical thinking performance and low critical thinking performance groups (five in each group), based on their performance in an earlier study ( Ku and Ho 2010 ) examining the cognitive ability, thinking disposition, academic achievement, and critical thinking performanc”