Cyberbullying Versus Face-to-Face Bullying A Theoretical and Conceptual Review

By Julian J. Dooley, Jacek Pyzalski, Donna Cross. 2009

850 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Communication, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6803d899df47a6494943caedd8f0180f1c5d87e2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

In Communication

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Cyberbullying: Labels, Behaviours and Definition in Three European Countries (2010, background): “Anonymity that occurs when the victim does not know the identity of the bully may increase feelings of frustration and powerlessness (e.g., Dooley et al., 2009; Slonje & Smith, 2008) and may reduce the need for power imbalance as a criterion (Fauman, 2008).”
Understanding the relationship between experiencing workplace cyberbullying, employee mental strain and job satisfaction: a dysempowerment approach (2017, background): “The stronger relationship seen for cyberbullying over offline bullying (particularly for job satisfaction) partially supports the notion that cyberbullying may have more severe outcomes than offline bullying (Campbell, 2005; Dooley et al., 2009).”
Why Do Adults Engage in Cyberbullying on Social Media? An Integration of Online Disinhibition and Deindividuation Effects with the Social Structure and Social Learning Model (2016, background): “Likewise, anonymity can also give bullies more power and control, as has also been theorized in the early cyberbullying literature (Dooley et al. 2009).”
A Comparison of Preservice Teachers’ Responses to Cyber Versus Traditional Bullying Scenarios (2014, background): “Some authors (Dooley et al., 2009) have suggested that we should not be surprised to find similarities between women and men with regard to cyber bullying issues, not least because the former are heavier email and text users than males, and that may “offset” males’ greater tendencies to be aggressiv”
Gender Differences in the Association Between Cyberbullying Victimization and Perpetration: The Role of Anger Rumination and Traditional Bullying Experiences (2020, background): “For instance, it has been proposed that TB victimization might motivate some individuals to engage in CB as a form of revenge within the safe confines of anonymity (Dooley et al. 2009; Hemphill et al. 2012).”
Cyber-Victimisation: The Association Between Help-Seeking Behaviours and Self-Reported Emotional Symptoms in Australia and Austria (2010, background): “One of the major challenges associated with cyberbullying is the dynamic environment within which these behaviours occur (Dooley et al., 2009b).”
Cyberbullying among youth: A comprehensive review of current international research and its implications and application to policy and practice (2013, background): “While anonymous messages may be perceived as more threatening and more fear- and anxiety-inducing, cyberbullying by known and/or trusted persons can also be very damaging (Dooley et al., 2009; Nocentini et al., 2010).”
The nature of cyberbullying, and strategies for prevention (2013, background): “A different aspect of power imbalance in cyberbullying has been suggested by Dooley, Pyzalski, and Cross (2009); that since the material exists in cyberspace it is harder to remove or to avoid it, and that this in itself can make the victim feel more powerless.”
Bullying in the digital age: a critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. (2014, methodology): “Because of the nature of the technology used to cyberbully, the “reward for engaging in cyberbullying is often delayed compared to traditional bullying” (Vannucci, Nocentini, Mazzoni, & Menesini, 2012, p. 185; see also Dooley et al., 2009).”
What Makes a Bully a Cyberbully? Unravelling the Characteristics of Cyberbullies across Twenty-Five European Countries (2013, background): “H3: The prevalence of unequal power relations in face-to-face bullying is often associatedwith physical or social power; for cyberbullying, however, power has been associated with high ICT abilities (Dooley et al., 2009; Patchin & Hinduja, 2006).”