A person‐centered approach to commitment research: Theory, research, and methodology

By John P. Meyer, Alexandre J. S. Morin. 2016

472 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/679fecbede1c50cb9cbe61a8ee8e21387e92cbb9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Citations in the corpus

Dual commitment in the organization: Effects of the interplay of team and organizational commitment on employee citizenship behavior, efficacy beliefs, and turnover intentions (2017, background): “…we recognize that variable-centered analyses have limitations: they describe how variables function across individuals, but do not take into account the existence of meaningful subgroups that may form based on commitment combinations (Meyer & Morin, 2016; Morin, Morizot, Boudrias, & Madore, 2010).”
Fuzzy Profiles (2018, background): “Most notably, organizational commitment researchers have embraced LPA, identifying profiles of commitment mindsets that vary in levels of affective, normative, and continuance commitment (Kabins, Xu, Bergman, Berry, & Willson, 2016; Morin et al., 2011; see J. P. Meyer & Morin, 2016, for a review).”
Variable-Centered, Person-Centered, and Person-Specific Approaches (2018, methodology): “Likewise, growth mixture models also identify profiles, but the profiles in this analysis are based on longitudinal trajectories (Griese et al., 2016; Meyer & Morin, 2016).”
Motivation profiles at work: A self-determination theory approach (2016, methodology): “Like the present study, future personcentered research should also strive to favor LPA over more traditional cluster analyses for reasons covered comprehensively elsewhere (Meyer & Morin, 2016; Morin, Maïano, Nagengast, Marsh, Morizot & Janosz, 2011; Vermunt & Magidson, 2002).”
Mixture Modeling for Lifespan Developmental Research (2019, methodology): “Arguably, evidence of generalizability in the context of person-centered research is typically built on an accumulation of studies (e.g., Kabins, Xu, Bergman, Berry, & Wilson, 2016; Meyer & Morin, 2016).”
Emotional labour profiles: Associations with key predictors and outcomes (2018, methodology): “Indeed, a key aspect of the process of construct validation that is required to ascertain that profiles represent substantively meaningful subpopulations is the systematic assessment of the extent to which these profiles generalise to distinct groups of participants (Meyer & Morin, 2016).”