Motivation profiles at work: A self-determination theory approach
By Joshua L. Howard, Marylène Gagné, Alexandre J. S. Morin, A. van den Broeck. 2016
388 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/25570cf7b27398a97d7021ecdad43ae995a8d605
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
- Nicolas Gillet
- J. Reeve
- Alexandre J. S. Morin
- Theodoros Kyriazos
- A. Stalikas
- Allison S. Gabriel
- Mo Wang
- Domingo Valero
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- A. Hirschi
- Nicolas Gillet
- Allison S. Gabriel
- J. Reeve
- Russell E. Johnson
- Daniel Spurk
- Christopher C. Rosen
- Mo Wang
In Social Psychology
- Nicolas Gillet
- Domingo Valero
- Alexandre J. S. Morin
- A. Hirschi
- Christopher C. Rosen
- Daniel Spurk
- A. Stalikas
- Theodoros Kyriazos
Citations in the corpus
- Fuzzy Profiles (2018, methodology): “…that the profiles had theoretical meaning that fit within our larger theoretical CSE framework and were not redundant with each other; as stated by Howard et al. (2016), profiles that have the same theoretical meaning as other profiles in the solution can suggest selecting a smaller profile…”
- From Strategy to Action: Transforming Organizational Goals into Organizational Behavior (2018, neutral): “…has shown that the combination of high autonomous motivation relative to controlled motivation yields superior performance and attitudinal outcomes (Howard et al. 2016), and because a large body of research shows that using contingent monetary rewards can decrease autonomous motivation (see Deci…”
- Applied Psychometrics: The Steps of Scale Development and Standardization Process (2018, methodology): “For scale validation studies refer to Howard et al. (2016), El Akremi, Gond, Swaen, De Roeck, and Igalens (2015), Konrath, Meier, Bushman (2017).”
- Stability, change, and implications of students’ motivation profiles: A latent transition analysis (2017, background): “These results are also consistent with Amabile’s (1993) suggestion that controlled motivation might synergistically combines with autonomous motivation to predict positive outcomes, especially for individuals who also display high levels of autonomous motivation (also see Howard et al., 2016b).”
- Latent profile analysis: A review and “how to” guide of its application within vocational behavior research (2020, background): “(2018) and Ployhart and Moliterno (2011), for the distinction between “person-centered” versus “person-specific” approaches see Howard and Hoffman (2018), and for the distinction between “categorical latent variable models” and “continuous latent variable models” see Bauer and Curran (2004), Molenaa”
- Beyond intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: A meta-analysis on self-determination theory’s multidimensional conceptualization of work motivation (2021, neutral): “Previous studies have differentiated employees based on profiles characterized by different levels of the types of motivation (e.g., Howard et al., 2016; Van den Broeck et al., 2013).”