Pillars of cooperation: Honesty-Humility, social value orientations, and economic behavior
By Benjamin E. Hilbig, Ingo Zettler. 2009
258 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Safety Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6760a9f7ddaa7ad471bb70cd21513750cd593906
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- Kibeom Lee
- M. Ashton
- Benjamin E. Hilbig
- R. D. Vries
- Ingo Zettler
- Timo Heydasch
- Morten Moshagen
- B. Visser
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Kibeom Lee
- Benjamin E. Hilbig
- M. Ashton
- Ingo Zettler
- Timo Heydasch
- B. Visser
- R. D. Vries
- Morten Moshagen
In Safety Research
- Benjamin E. Hilbig
- Timo Heydasch
- Kibeom Lee
- Ingo Zettler
- M. Ashton
- R. D. Vries
- Joshua M. Tybur
- M. van Vugt
Citations in the corpus
- Tracing the Path from Personality — via Cooperativeness — to Conservation (2013, methodology): “In particular, it has been shown that even individuals low in HH will shift towards cooperative behaviour if non-cooperative behaviour is visible to others and if they must fear retaliation or punishment for noncooperation (Hilbig & Zettler, 2009; Hilbig et al., 2012).”
- Humble persons are more helpful than less humble persons: Evidence from three studies (2012, background): “With regard to prosocial behavior, persons high in humility have been more cooperative in economic games (Hilbig & Zettler, 2009 ).”
- Trust: An Integrative Review from a Person–Situation Perspective (2015, unknown): “…Hilbig, Zettler, Leist, & Heydasch, 2013; Thielmann, Hilbig, & Niedtfeld, 2014; Thielmann & Hilbig, 2014; Zettler, Hilbig, & Heydasch, 2013) as well as to prosocial SVO (Ackermann, Fleiß, & Murphy, in press; Hilbig et al., 2014; Hilbig, Zettler, Moshagen, & Heydasch, 2013; Hilbig & Zettler, 2009).”
- Humble Beginnings: Current Trends, State Perspectives, and Hallmarks of Humility (2013, background): “Individuals high in Honesty–Humility treat competitors more fairly when sharing resources in an economic game, even when circumstances permit them to take more (Hilbig & Zettler, 2009).”
- Do Humble CEOs Matter? An Examination of CEO Humility and Firm Outcomes (2018, background): “In support of this logic, Hilbig and Zettler (2009) found that humble people competing in various game theory–derived experiments unselfishly and fairly allocated rewards.”
- Associations between Dispositional Humility and Social Relationship Quality (2011, background): “Honest-humble persons were observed to be cooperative in an economic game (Hilbig & Zettler, 2009).”
- Motives for Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Personality Correlates and Coworker Ratings of OCB (2012, background): “Finally, the manipulative tactics of those low in Honesty–Humility have been demonstrated in a dictator—ultimatum game context ( Hilbig & Zettler, 2009 ).”
- Personality, Punishment and Public Goods: Strategic Shifts towards Cooperation as a Matter of Dispositional Honesty–Humility (2012, methodology): “R (Lee & Ashton, 2004), as previously used by Hilbig & Zettler (2009) in the Web context.”
- Objections to the HEXACO Model of Personality Structure—and why those Objections Fail (2020, unknown): “…out in studies of people’s directly observed behaviour in economic games and behavioural ethics tasks (Hilbig, Thielmann, Klein, & Henninger, 2016; Hilbig & Zettler, 2009; Hilbig & Zettler, 2015; Hilbig, Zettler, Leist, & Heydasch, 2013; Zettler, Hilbig, & Heydasch, 2013; Zhao, Ferguson, &…”
- Serving the Self From the Seat of Power (2014, background): “For instance, participants low in honesty-humility kept more resources for themselves in a series of economic games when they were in a more powerful position than their partner, but not otherwise (Hilbig & Zettler, 2009).”
- Evolution, situational affordances, and the HEXACO model of personality (2016, background): “For example, in line with Hilbig and Zettler (2009) and Hilbig et al. (2012), the success of high versus low honesty–humility individuals could be observed in economic games that vary in the degree to which antisocial behaviors can be punished.”
- Honesty–Humility and a Person–Situation Interaction at Work (2010, background): “This hypothesis mirrors previous results showing that strategically adapting behaviour to situations in order to gain advantages or exploit others is a mark specific to those low in honesty–humility (Hilbig & Zettler, 2009).”