Objections to the HEXACO Model of Personality Structure—and why those Objections Fail

By M. Ashton, Kibeom Lee. 2020

151 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The six–dimensional HEXACO model of personality structure and its associated inventory have increasingly been used in personality research. But in spite of the evidence supporting this structure and demonstrating its advantages over five–dimensional models, some researchers continue to use and promote the latter. Although there has been little overt, organized argument against the adoption of the HEXACO model, we do hear sporadic offerings of reasons for retaining the five–dimensional systems, usually in informal conversations, in manuscript reviews, on social media platforms, and occasionally in published works. In this target article, we list all of the objections to the HEXACO model that we have heard of, and we then explain why each objection fails. © 2020 European Association of Personality Psychology

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/08d662ff258014f851839a7d888bdd67651173b9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

  1. M. Back
  2. W. Bleidorn
  3. C. Kandler
  4. B. Roberts
  5. M. Jokela
  6. Matthias Ziegler
  7. Johannes Zimmermann
  8. Christopher J. Hopwood

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

  1. M. Back
  2. W. Bleidorn
  3. Sacha Epskamp
  4. C. Kandler
  5. M. Jokela
  6. Christopher J. Hopwood
  7. B. Roberts
  8. David M. Condon

Citations in the corpus