Commercial Teacher Selection Instruments: The Validity of Selecting Teachers Through Beliefs, Attitudes, and Values

97 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Context matters: principals' sensemaking of teacher hiring and on‐the‐job performance (2011, background): “Gallup's Teacher Perceiver Interview) and mandating minimal scores, their utility may be limited by having only modest relationships to measures of teacher quality ( Metzger and Wu, 2008”
Spring cleaning for the “messy” construct of teachers’ beliefs: What are they? Which have been examined? What can they tell us? (2012, background): “On the basis of their meta-analysis of 24 studies, Metzger and Wu (2008) critiqued this approach to hiring teachers and discussed the various complications with it.”
How Teacher Evaluation Methods Matter for Accountability (2014, background): “…seeking for new ideas and experiences to share with students), activation (capacity to motivate students), innovation (implementation of new ideas and techniques), ‘‘Gestalt’’ (a drive for perfectionism but works from individual to structure), objectivity, and focus (Metzger & Wu, 2008, p. 923).”