Cocreation of Value in a Platform Ecosystem: The Case of Enterprise Software

By Marco Ceccagnoli, Chris M. Forman, Peng Huang, Dongjun Wu. MIS Q., 2012

844 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/66007118ad2e9ae6af4c69f74a732dea493b3506

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Service Innovation: A Service-Dominant Logic Perspective (2015, background): “Ceccagnoli et al. (2012) empirically establish the varied benefits that can accrue to firms that participate in platform-based closed ecosystems.”
Towards a theory of ecosystems (2018, positive): “Studies on platform-based ecosystems have considered connections between the platform sponsor and its complementors (Ceccagnoli et al. , 2012; Cennamo & Santaló, 2013; Gawer & Henderson, 2007) established through standards and platform interfaces (Gawer 2014), the leadership role of the platform at…”
On open innovation, platforms, and entrepreneurship (2018, background): “Specifically, while a few recent studies (e.g., Bogers et al., 2017; Ceccagnoli et al., 2012; Gruber, MacMillan, & Thompson, 2013; Huang et al., 2013; Nambisan, 2017; Nambisan & Baron, 2013; Zahra & Nambisan, 2011) have highlighted some of the related issues, there has been limited examination of…”
Technology Ecosystem Governance (2014, background): “Firstly, it is one of the few empirical examples of how technology platforms function in a for-profit, business-to-business context (Sarker et al. 2012, Ceccagnoli et al. 2012).”
Value Creation through Novel Resource Configurations in a Digitally Enabled World (2017, background): “…with partners who own complementary resources, as a value-creating resource con ﬁ guration has been increasingly recognized by the received literatures on alliances (Lavie, 2007; Wassmer & Dussauge, 2011) and business ecosystems (Adner & Kapoor, 2010; Ceccagnoli, Forman, Huang, & DJ, 2012).”
How entrepreneurial SMEs compete through digital platforms: The roles of digital platform capability, network capability and ambidexterity (2019, background): “Finally, a platform-based network capability gives rise to a sense of belonging to a network of firms that provides positive customer recognition and access to a better position from which to negotiate with other firms (Ceccagnoli, Forman, Huang, & Wu, 2012).”
Distributed Tuning of Boundary Resources: The Case of Apple's iOS Service System (2015, background): “systems (Ceccagnoli et al. 2012; Iansiti and Levien 2004).”
Digital platforms for development: Foundations and research agenda (2021, background): “Traditionally, the digital platform literature refers to a ‘ platform ecosystem ’ (Jacobides et al., 2018) to the broad set of actors that contribute to the functioning of a given platform (Ceccagnoli et al., 2012; Gawer & Cusumano, 2008).”
Service Innovation in the Digital Age: Key Contributions and Future Directions (2015, background): “Beyond supply chains, information economics studies have explored how ICT innovations can alter the ways in which markets function and thus how firm value is created or distributed in a market (Ceccagnoli et al. 2012; Han et al. 2012).”
Platform Competition: A Systematic and Interdisciplinary Review of the Literature (2020, positive): “These collective production systems were networks of symbiotic relationships between firms, much like biological ecosystems, and soon researchers started calling them “platform ecosystems” (e.g., Ceccagnoli et al., 2012; Ghazawneh & Henfridsson, 2013; Tiwana, 2015a).”
Innovation, Openness, and Platform Control (2018, background): “Further, platforms are building blocks serving as a foundation for constructing complementary products and services (Gawer and Cusumano 2002, 2008; Gawer and Henderson 2007), or as systems for matching buyers and suppliers who transact with each other using system resources (Hagiu and Wright 2015) o”