Self- and Other-Referent Criteria of Career Success

By Peter A. Heslin. 2003

210 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/625dc78149984fcb06cb6e743fabaebd93585f0a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. Nicky Dries
2. Daniel Spurk
3. A. Abele
4. Roland Pepermans
5. A. Hirschi
6. J. Arnold
7. L. Cohen
8. Allison B. Duke

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. Nicky Dries
2. Daniel Spurk
3. A. Abele
4. A. Hirschi
5. Roland Pepermans
6. J. Arnold
7. L. Cohen
8. E. D. Kerpel

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. A. Hirschi
2. Daniel Spurk
3. Nicky Dries
4. A. Abele
5. Roland Pepermans
6. J. Arnold
7. L. Cohen
8. Allison B. Duke

Citations in the corpus

• The Interactive Effect of Leader-Member Exchange and Political Skill on Subjective Career Success (2007, background): “Existing measures of subjective career success have been challenged (Heslin, 2003), and further development of the subjective career success construct appears warranted.”
• How do objective and subjective career success interrelate over time (2009, background): “Dependent on the comparison standard, i.e. self versus others, subjective success can be conceptualized as self-referent subjective success or as other-referent subjective success (cf. Abele & Wiese, 2008; Dette et al., 2004; Heslin, 2003, 2005).”
• The influence of family responsibilities, career fields and gender on career success (2008, background): “Despite the huge body of literature on factors influencing career success, little scholarly attention has been devoted to analyzing the concept of career success itself (Greenhaus, 2003; Heslin, 2003; Sturges, 1999).”
• Antecedents and Outcomes of Objective Versus Subjective Career Success: Competing Perspectives and Future Directions (2018, background): “…measured as career satisfaction (Greenhaus, Parasuraman, & Wormley, 1990; Seibert, Kraimer, Holtom, & Pierotti, 2013) or perceived career success (Heslin, 2003; Turban & Dougherty, 1994), and more recently as a multidimensional evaluation of career facets, such as growth and development,…”
• Exploring four generations' beliefs about career: Is “satisfied” the new “successful”? (2008, background): “There has been surprisingly little research, however, devoted to the nature of career success (Greenhaus, 2003; Heslin, 2003; Sturges, 1999), although the construct itself has often been used as a research variable (e.”
• The Psychology of Careers in Industrial - Organizational Settings: A Critical but Appreciative Analysis (2008, background): “However, Heslin (2005) suggests that people tend to think of their experiences at work in one of three ways: as a job, a career, or a calling.”
• Conceptualizing and Evaluating Career Success (2005, background): “but be happy with the state of their career because of the prospects it brings (Heslin, 2003a). For instance, Wilensky (1960) described how graduate students defer gratification by working long hours for little direct compensation, in the hope of being well rewarded following graduation.”
• The Next Generation of Career Success: Implications for HRD (2008, unknown): “(2005) and Heslin (2005) lament the lack of qualitative research in this area.”