Using SPSS for Windows and Macintosh: Analyzing and Understanding Data
By John Hansen. 2005
872 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Sociology and Political Science, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/61662f3e6db1d2b70e1b7eeecf81e20e3af0103d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Sociology and Political Science
- Mei-Chen Lin
- Yan Bing Zhang
- R. Murray‐Harvey
- Mary E. Morningstar
- E. Baker
- William J. Fremouw
- Brad J. Nakamura
- Andrew E. Walker
In Statistics and Probability
- Yan Bing Zhang
- Mei-Chen Lin
- R. Murray‐Harvey
- Mary E. Morningstar
- E. Baker
- William J. Fremouw
- Brad J. Nakamura
- Andrew E. Walker
Citations in the corpus
- Preliminary Lessons About Supporting Participation and Learning in Inclusive Classrooms (2015, background): “The .76 coefficient alpha value indicated moderate to high overall reliability (Green & Salkind, 2008).”
- Construction and Validation of an Instrument to Measure Environmental Orientations in a Diverse Group of Children (2011, methodology): “Construct and content validity were then assessed with multiple techniques including Catell’s scree test, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and item analysis via Pearson correlations (Green & Salkind, 2008).”
- Harmony, Hierarchy and Conservatism: A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Confucian Values in China, Korea, Japan, and Taiwan (2005, methodology): “For the pairwise comparisons, Bonferroni adjustments were made to alphas to control for Type I error (Green & Salkind, 2003).”
- Perceptions of Conflict Management Styles in Chinese Intergenerational Dyads (2005, methodology): “For the pairwise comparisons, Bonferroni adjustments were made to alphas to control for Type I error (Green & Salkind, 2003).”
- What makes pronunciation teaching work? Testing for the effect of two variables: socially constructed metalanguage and critical listening (2011, methodology): “A one-way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) is conducted for each of the tests using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS), version 14 (see, e.g., Green and Salking, 2005).”
- Self-Efficacy in Second/Foreign Language Learning Contexts. (2012, background): “Correlational analyses cannotdetermine the causal relationship between self-efficacy and other variables; they simply show the extent of relatedness of the variables (Green & Salkind, 2005).”
- A Preliminary Investigation of the Relationship of Transition Preparation and Self-Determination for Students With Disabilities in Postsecondary Educational Settings (2010, result): “These estimates indicated high overall reliability and above average to high internal consistency for the subscales (Green & Salkind, 2008).”
- Accessed from (neutral): “Discussion The results show a few statistically significant differences according to age; however, the effect sizes for all age differences were below what is considered a small effect size (Green & Salkind, 2005 ).”
- A Model for Doctoral Students’ Perceptions and Attitudes Toward Written Feedback for Academic Writing (2011, methodology): “Item Reliability and Commonality Analyses Item analysis using reliability procedure was conducted with 107 standardized items according to the guidelines of Green and Salkind (2005). Cronbach’s alpha if item deleted values ranged from 0.”
- The Psychological Profile of White-collar Offenders (2012, result): “In addition, the findings in this study for the PAI Alcohol Problems scale were quite substantial, demonstrating a large effect size (partial η2 = .19; see Green & Salkind, 2005).”
- School bullying by one or more ways: Does it matter and how do students cope? (2011, methodology): “Cramer’s V was used to calculate the effect size (ES) where chi-square tests were undertaken, and eta squared (Z2) was used to calculate the effect size (ES) where Kruskal Wallis tests were used (Green & Salkind, 2008).”
- A Psychometric Analysis of the Child Behavior Checklist DSM-Oriented Scales (2009, methodology): “14 and interpreted as small, medium, and large effect sizes, respectively (Green and Salkind 2005).”