Paradigms in the study of creativity: Introducing the perspective of cultural psychology

By V. Glăveanu. 2010

369 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5f5254ff569f11eda5e7430c4a8740dd720e27b5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Maciej Karwowski
2. A. Gajda
3. V. Glăveanu
4. Mathias Benedek
5. J. Gralewski
6. Emanuel Jauk
7. Jan Dul
8. Katja Vähäsantanen

In Social Psychology

1. Maciej Karwowski
2. A. Gajda
3. Katja Vähäsantanen
4. Raija Hämäläinen
5. Mathias Benedek
6. Emanuel Jauk
7. Jan Dul
8. V. Glăveanu

Citations in the corpus

• A Sociocultural Theory of Creativity: Bridging the Social, the Material, and the Psychological (2020, background): “And it was only since the 1980s that creativity got to also be “socialized,” with Lev Vygotsky’s cultural-historical thinking greatly contributing to this effort (see Glăveanu, 2010).”
• Children and creativity: A most (un)likely pair? (2011, background): “Original citation: Glăveanu, Vlad Petre (2011) Children and creativity: a most (un)likely pair? Thinking skills and creativity, 6 (2).”
• Is creativity without intelligence possible? A Necessary Condition Analysis (2016, background): “…40 Szczesliwicka St., ski). al., Is creativity without intel 6 Although different taxonomies of creativity have been proposed over the decades (see Glăveanu, 2010, 2014 for a discussion), the crucial distinction from the perspective we take in this article is that between creative potential…”
• Theoretical and Pedagogical Perspectives on Orchestrating Creativity and Collaborative Learning. (2011, background): “…to this perspective, creativity involves situated interaction processes with other members working with the topic that are mediated by the present context (e.g. tools, forms and technologies) (Glăveanu, 2010; John-Steiner, 2000; Miell & Littleton, 2004; Paulus & Nijstad, 2003; Sawyer, 2006b).”
• Rewriting the Language of Creativity: The Five A's Framework (2013, background): “The “cultural model of creativity” (see Sefton-Green, 2000, p. 220) and a We-paradigm type of approach (Glăveanu, 2010) were formulated and emphasized the necessity of considering creators and creations in relation to a series of audiences and a cultural background of accumulated artifacts, norms,…”
• How are we creative together? Comparing sociocognitive and sociocultural answers (2011, background): “It is only in the last decades that propositions have been made to look beyond this “myth” (Montuori and Purser, 1995, 1999), to rediscover Vygotskian perspectives to the creative process (John-Steiner, 2000) and formulate a cultural psychology of creativity (Glăveanu, 2009).”
• The psychology of creativity: A critical reading (2014, background): “This observation led me, previously, to define three main paradigms within creativity research: the He, the I, and the We (see Glăveanu, 2010a).”