Age Bias in Laboratory and Field Settings: A Meta‐Analytic Investigation

By R. A. Gordon, R. Arvey. 2004

205 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Demography, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5f38c49476206bc8a31464021968c3a97d0ac1d7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Demography

1. Marjan Gorgievski
2. E. King
3. M. van Vugt
4. Lisa M. Finkelstein
5. Annet de Lange
6. P. M. Bal

In Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology

1. Ruth A. Lamont
2. Dominic Abrams
3. B. I. van der Heijden
4. E. King
5. H. Swift
6. Katherine M Ryan
7. Lisbeth Drury
8. Lisa M. Finkelstein

In Sociology and Political Science

1. M. van Vugt
2. Allen Grabo
3. Brian R. Spisak
4. Ruth A. Lamont
5. Marjan Gorgievski
6. Dominic Abrams
7. E. King
8. R. Arvey

Citations in the corpus

• Learning at the workplace and sustainable employability: a multi-source model moderated by age (2016, background): “…ratings, as a more thorough interaction between the two parties is expected to lead to a higher amount of individuate knowledge (Finkelstein & Burke, 1998; Gordon & Arvey, 2004; Kite, Stockdale, Whitley Jr., & Johnson, 2005) and to a favourable social context (Vecchio, 1993; Waldron & Hunt, 1992).”
• What do the young (old) people think of me? Content and accuracy of age-based metastereotypes (2013, background): “…research has demonstrated that stereotypes can result in unfair, sometimes illegal, and often unwise workplace decisions in the context of hiring, performance reviews, promotions, and opportunities for training (see Finkelstein, Burke, & Raju, 1995, and Gordon & Arvey, 2004, for meta-analyses).”
• The age of exploration and exploitation: Younger-looking leaders endorsed for change and older-looking leaders endorsed for stability (2014, background): “…a meta-analysis of findings gathered in the lab and the field (the latter representing an older sample) indicate a consistent and significant perception of older group member as stable and reliable and younger members as more open to change and adaptable in both settings (Gordon & Arvey, 2004).”
• The Risks of Ageism Model: How Ageism and Negative Attitudes toward Age Can Be a Barrier to Active Aging (2017, background): “…appraisals (see Posthuma & Campion, 2008 for review), are excluded from participating in work-based teams (McCann & Giles, 2005), are less likely to receive opportunities for training (North & Fiske, 2016), or are excluded from the workforce altogether (Finkelstein, 2015; Gordon & Arvey, 2004).”