Ability Self-Concepts and Subjective Value in Literacy: Joint Trajectories From Grades 1 Through 12

203 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Adolescents’ motivation for reading: group differences and relation to standardized achievement (2014, background): “One pattern has been that, as they become older, there is a tendency for students’ motivational beliefs and attitudes about school subjects to become less adaptive (Archambault et al., 2010; Gottfried et al., 2001).”
A Developmental, Person-Centered Approach to Exploring Multiple Motivational Pathways in Gifted Underachievement (2013, background): “…more nuanced, person-centered approach to understanding the multiple pathways to achievement (or underachievement) and to consider how these trajectories are shaped by parents and educators (e.g., Archambault et al., 2010; Linnenbrink-Garcia & Fredricks, 2008; Pintrich, 2003; Shell & Husman, 2008).”
Trajectories of change in students’ self-concepts of ability and values in math and college major choice (2015, methodology): “Archambault et al. (2010), also using the CAB data, identified seven trajectories of change in literacy SCA and values rather than the three we identified.”
Studying technology-based strategies for enhancing motivation in mathematics (2014, background): “Finally, with respect to developmental issues in motivation, the literature is clear that there is a general decline in motivation as students progress through school (Archambault et al. 2010; Eccles et al. 1984).”