Facilitating Student Engagement: Lessons Learned from Check & Connect Longitudinal Studies
By Mary F. Sinclair, S. Christenson, C. Lehr, Amy R. Anderson. 2003
247 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5cccb6ff2d81a76671c8c42c82633d1d47ce2483
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- J. Pitzer
- Ellen A. Skinner
- R. N. Landis
- Gwen C. Marchand
- Amy L. Reschly
- Joanne Banks
- S. McCoy
- Jennifer Fredricks
Citations in the corpus
- Engagement and Disaffection in the Classroom: Part of a Larger Motivational Dynamic? (2008, background): “The first focuses on the distinction between indicators versus facilitators of engagement (Sinclair et al., 2003).”
- Reading and School Completion: Critical Connections and Matthew Effects (2010, background): “Check & Connect is a targeted or indicated individual intervention for students who are marginalized or at increased risk for poor educational outcomes (Sinclair et al., 2003).”
- Simply academic? Why children with special educational needs don’t like school (2012, background): “Similar to Sinclair et al. (2003), we identify the importance of three contexts when studying school engagement – the family, school and peers.”
- Reexamining Gifted Underachievement and Dropout Through the Lens of Student Engagement (2013, background): “Student engagement is an increasingly researched topic in the literature regarding high school dropout (Christenson et al., 2000; Christenson et al., 2008; Reschly & Christenson, 2006a; Sinclair et al., 2003) and may have important implications for identifying gifted students at risk for future unde”