A New Identity for Identity Research

By Seth J. Schwartz. 2005

258 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5b54c4fa3fc4513b3e88e130340daf56f35cd7c7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Processes of personal identity formation and evaluation. (2011, background): “Consequently, an important aim of our recent work has been to validate the five-dimensional identity model in new target groups and demonstrate the usefulness of studying identity formation and evaluation processes in young people outside the high school or college context (Schwartz, 2005).”
Developmental trajectories and reciprocal associations between career adaptability and vocational identity: A three-wave longitudinal study with adolescents (2015, unknown): “In fact, as strongly recommended (e.g., Schwartz, 2005), we employed a longitudinal design with shorter time intervals (three to four months), which allowed us to analyze career adaptability and vocational identity in greater detail.”
Hybrid and Alternating Identity Styles as Strategies for Managing Multicultural Identities (2018, background): “Combining developmental approaches to personal identity formation (Berzonsky, 1989, 1992, 2007; Schwartz, 2005, 2006, 2007) with acculturation theory (Berry, 2003, 2005; Ward & Geeraert, 2016), we argue that hybridizing and alternating cultural identities are activated by a desire to achieve…”
Daily Dynamics of Personal Identity and Self–Concept Clarity (2011, background): “…varying ages, most of the research on personal identity and self-concept clarity has been conducted with college students or other emerging adults (e.g. Constantino, Wilson, & Horowitz, 2006; Luyckx et al., 2008), who are likely in the process of consolidating a sense of identity (Schwartz, 2005).”
Identity in Emerging Adulthood (2013, background): “Several years ago, Schwartz (2005) outlined a number of priority areas to which identity research should attend—internalizing problems and health risk behaviors, immigration and acculturation, and terrorism.”
The relationships of personal and ethnic identity exploration to indices of adaptive and maladaptive psychosocial functioning (2009, methodology): “An additional issue that needs to be addressed in identity research is ethnicity and culture (Schwartz, 2005; Schwartz, Zamboanga, & Weisskirch, 2008).”
Community and religious involvement as contexts of identity change across late adolescence and emerging adulthood (2011, background): “Fourth, the identity statuses paradigm has a number of limitations that have spurred alternative conceptual models and measurement approaches, such as that of Luyckx et al. (2006), which emphasize processes rather than statuses (for recent reviews, see Schwartz, 2001, 2005).”
Time perspective and identity formation: Short-term longitudinal dynamics in college students (2010, background): “Such findings emphasize the need to chart the processes of time perspective and identity formation in less privileged youth around the globe with the barriers they face (Galambos & Martı́nez, 2007; Schwartz, 2005; Yoder, 2000).”
Information-oriented identity processing, identity consolidation, and well-being: The moderating role of autonomy, self-reflection, and self-rumination (2007, background): “Further, the inclusion of university students only likely excluded lower-income and less educated adolescents, a group that has received little attention in identity research (Schwartz, 2005).”
Past, Present and Future Research on Multiple Identities: Toward an Intrapersonal Network Approach (2014, background): “Notable exceptions were psychoanalytic scholars who formulated and drew upon ego identity (Erikson, 1980; Marcia, 1966; Schwartz, 2005) and object relations theory (Klein,”
The personality‐identity interplay in emerging adult women: convergent findings from complementary analyses (2006, background): “Due to the salience of identity formation towards adolescent functioning (Berzonsky & Adams, 1999; Marcia, 1980), numerous pleas have been made to examine antecedent factors that contribute to individual differences in identity formation (Schwartz, 2005).”
Identity Development, Personality, and Well‐Being in Adolescence and Emerging Adulthood (2012, methodology): “Does a period of emerging adulthood still occur in such societies, and if not, when does the majority of personal identity development take place? Second, and relatedly, the ways in which identity develops between early adolescence and emerging adulthood are in need of examination (Schwartz, 2005).”
Developmental Typologies of Identity Formation and Adjustment in Female Emerging Adults: A Latent Class Growth Analysis Approach (2008, background): “Similarly, future studies should also begin assessing identity earlier in adolescence, as a way of enabling researchers to identify antecedents to and longer-term trajectories of identity development (Schwartz, 2005).”
Employment, Sense of Coherence, and Identity Formation (2008, background): “Given the increased ethnic heterogeneity characterizing many Western countries, however, it may be important to replicate the present findings with non-White individuals (Schwartz, 2005).”
The Structure of Identity Consolidation: Multiple Correlated Constructs or One Superordinate Construct? (2007, methodology): “Ascertaining cross-ethnic consistency in identity processes and their relationships to comparison variables is an important research direction (S. J. Schwartz, 2005; S. J. Schwartz, Côté, et al., 2005) and can help to specify more clearly the role of ethnicity in identity development (cf. Sneed,…”
The Study of Adolescent Identity Formation 2000–2010: A Review of Longitudinal Research (2011, background): “Therefore, future research should focus more on samples from the general population (Schwartz, 2005).”
The Role of Domain Content in Understanding Identity Development Processes (2016, background): “Some have argued that this approach voids the context and the person from the rich study of identity (van Hoof, 1999; Josselson & Flum, forthcoming; Schwartz, 2005; Syed & Azmitia, 2008).”