Relationships and Resilience

By Jody Hoffer Gittell. 2008

112 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5ad7df7898fb6fed385e6e96e6426e0828352662

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Alfredo De Massis
2. T. Williams
3. Jonas Soluk
4. Dean A. Shepherd
5. Halit Keskin
6. Nadine H. Kammerlander
7. Ali E. Akgün
8. Daniel A. Gruber

In Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

1. Dean A. Shepherd
2. Stephanie Duchek
3. Ali E. Akgün
4. Kathleen M. Sutcliffe
5. Halit Keskin

In Strategy and Management

1. T. Williams
2. Halit Keskin
3. Stephanie Duchek
4. Dean A. Shepherd
5. Ali E. Akgün
6. Kathleen M. Sutcliffe
7. Alfredo De Massis
8. Daniel A. Gruber

Citations in the corpus

• Organizational response to adversity: Fusing crisis management and resilience research streams (2017, background): “For example, relationships—in the form of coordinative practices—have been found to be critical in overcoming challenges (Gittell, 2008).”
• Organisational resilience capacity and firm product innovativeness and performance (2014, background): “Such that, resilience is closely associated with the capability and ability of an organisation to return to a stable state after a disruption (e.g. solving just the current product-related problems) (Mallak 1998; Watanabe, Kishioka, and Nagamatsu 2004; Gittell 2008; Bhamra, Dani, and Burnard 2011).”
• Organizational resilience: a capability-based conceptualization (2019, background): “Empirical evidence could be found for the relationship between relational reserves and recovery (Gittell et al. 2006), relational coordination and resilient response (Gittell 2008) as well as social capital resources and the resilience of family firms (Brewton et al. 2010; Danes et al. 2009).”
• Exogenous shocks and the adaptive capacity of family firms: exploring behavioral changes and digital technologies in the COVID‐19 pandemic (2021, background): “For instance, organizations’ human resources, their cognitive abilities (LengnickHall and Beck, 2005; Lengnick- Hall et al., 2011), and the routine of regularly sharing information inside the firm (Gittell, 2008) were found to be prerequisites for reacting flexibly to exogenous shocks.”