The Wheel of Competency Assessment: Presenting Quality Criteria for Competency Assessment Programs.

192 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Evaluating assessment quality in competence-based education: A qualitative comparison of two frameworks (2007, methodology): “New Applications of Traditional Quality Criteria In a previous study (Baartman et al., 2006) we already described a number of problems with regard to the use of validity and reliability to evaluate CAPs.”
Rubrics as a way of providing transparency in assessment (2014, background): “Some researchers (e.g. Baartman et al. 2006) have therefore argued that assessments – if they are to be considered valid – should include means to provide transparency as a way to promote learning of the same skills that the assessment was intended to capture (cf. the ‘backwash effect’ described by…”
Competency Definitions, Development and Assessment: A Brief Review (2020, methodology): “Therefore, it is necessary to use a few assessment methods to measure the competency levels of individuals accurately and effectively in performing specific tasks and roles (Baartman et al., 2006).”