Mixed Methods in Intervention Research: Theory to Adaptation

By B. Nastasi, John H. Hitchcock, Sreeroopa Sarkar, G. Burkholder, K. Varjas, A. Jayasena. 2007

146 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/57539eae10fd98b36a7bfb1dfdcbbdaa45489e38

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In General Health Professions

In Management Science and Operations Research

Citations in the corpus

Defining family engagement among Latino Head Start parents: A mixed-methods measurement development study (2013, background): “Nastasi and olleagues (Hitchcock et al., 2005; Nastasi et al., 2007), through heir work in international contexts, have gone about the task of efining constructs in partnership with members of the populaions they serve.”
Opening the black box: Presenting a model for evaluating organizational-level interventions (2013, background): “Combining both qualitative and quantitative results through mixed methods may offer four important benefits: Identification of the mechanisms behind any changes brought about by the intervention; added meaning to the results of outcome evaluation; cross-validated and triangulated results; and identi”
Achieving integration in mixed methods designs-principles and practices. (2013, methodology): “In a multistage mixed methods framework, researchers use multiple stages of data collection that may include various combinations of exploratory sequential, explanatory sequential, and convergent approaches (Nastasi et al. 2007).”
Guidelines for Conducting Mixed-methods Research: An Extension and Illustration (2016, unknown): “program (i.e., multistrand) (Nastasi et al., 2007, 2010).”
The future of organizational interventions: Addressing the challenges of today's organizations (2010, methodology): “If we are to understand the how and why of successful interventions, we are forced to also consider formative evaluation approaches in conjunction with outcome evaluation (Nastasi et al., 2007).”