Achieving integration in mixed methods designs-principles and practices.

By Michael D. Fetters, L. Curry, J. D. Creswell. Health Services Research, 2013

4,559 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, General Health Professions

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b6ea6e9e00a8d682cf725c7798e8cfbfef2a7836

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

Citations in the corpus

Saturation controversy in qualitative research: Complexities and underlying assumptions. A literature review (2020, background): “It is a matter of judgement, yet a relevant and representative sample must allow the research to address the fundamental measures of validity in qualitative research such as rigor, credibility of findings, conformability, trustworthiness and acceptability (Fetters et al., 2013).”
Convergent and sequential synthesis designs: implications for conducting and reporting systematic reviews of qualitative and quantitative evidence (2017, neutral): “and the interpretation and reporting [35, 36].”
Speaking their language: The role of cultural content integration and heritage language for academic achievement among Latino children (2019, background): “…of confirmation of the quantitative trends, highlighting the importance of critical awareness for ABPs, but also showed evidence of expansion (Fetters et al., 2013) of the quantitative data, revealing that teachers can perceive ABPs not only for socio-engagement value, but also for academic…”
Improving the content validity of the mixed methods appraisal tool: a modified e-Delphi study. (2019, background): “Also, Fetters, Curry, and Creswell [31] identified three integration levels (design, methods, and interpretation/reporting).”
Joint displays for mixed methods research in psychology (2021, background): “We discuss the different forms of integration served by joint displays for methods and analyses (Fetters et al., 2013), how the examples provided serve mixing purposes (Greene et al., 1989), and identify innovative forms of joint displays in psychological research.”
Qualitative Methods in Implementation Research: An Introduction (2019, background): “…used commonly in implementation science, as both qualitative and quantitative findings can be integrated in order to generate “unique insights into multifaceted phenomena related to health care quality, access, and delivery” (Fetters et al., 2013; see also Aarons et al., 2012; Robins et al., 2008).”
Methodological guidance for the conduct of mixed methods systematic reviews (2020, neutral): “This is usually the case for mixed methods research that applies a sequential explanatory design 33 (ie, where qualitative findings are used to interpret or explain quantitative results).”