Does Treatment Integrity Matter? A Preliminary Investigation of Instructional Implementation and Mathematics Performance
By G. Noell, F. Gresham, Kristin A. Gansle. 2002
187 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/55d358befba6f881a8493cb2a425780e74c6e071
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- A. Vanderheyden
- R. Skiba
- Lisa M. Hagermoser Sanetti
- Josepha Witt
- R. Peterson
- Thomas Kratochwill
- G. Sugai
- M. Rocque
In Education
- A. Vanderheyden
- R. Skiba
- R. Peterson
- Josepha Witt
- Thomas Kratochwill
- Lisa M. Hagermoser Sanetti
- M. Rocque
- E. Arcia
In Statistics and Probability
Citations in the corpus
- Supporting teacher use of interventions: effects of response dependent performance feedback on teacher implementation of a math intervention (2007, background): “The results from this study provide further support for the utility of performance feedback as a follow-up procedure for consultation that improves treatment implementation and student learning outcomes in regular education classrooms (Martens et al. 1997; Noell et al. 1997, 2000, 2002b, 2005; Wit”
- Treatment Integrity in Behavioral Consultation: Measurement, Promotion, and Outcomes (2007, background): “Noell, Gresham, and Gansle (2002) investigated three levels of computer delivered math instruction.”
- Teaching the Social Curriculum: School Discipline as Instruction (2003, background): “The extent to which an intervention is implemented as planned has been labeled variously treatment integrity ( Noell, Gresham, & Gansle, 2002 ), quality of implementation (Gottfredson et al., 2000), and treatment fidelity (Elliott, Hatot, Sirovatka, & Potter, 2001).”