Institutional Ownership and Corporate Social Performance: The Moderating Effects of Investment Horizon, Activism, and Coordination

By Donald O. Neubaum, Shaker A. Zahra. 2006

505 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/53ae7fb8d57b868744d1fca15dc07f01a2cc9f87

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Bert Scholtens
2. Lammertjan Dam
3. Kees G. Koedijk
4. J. T. Horst
5. Jeroen Derwall
6. P. Berrone
7. James E. Mattingly
8. Luis R. Gómez-Mejía

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Ante Glavas
2. C. Lee
3. Roger C. Y. Chen
4. Herman Aguinis
5. Lammertjan Dam
6. P. Berrone
7. Yuan Lu
8. Barbara J. Sainty

In Strategy and Management

1. Bert Scholtens
2. Lammertjan Dam
3. Ante Glavas
4. C. Lee
5. Roger C. Y. Chen
6. Kees G. Koedijk
7. Jeroen Derwall
8. Herman Aguinis

Citations in the corpus

• A tale of values-driven and profit-seeking social investors (2011, background): “In a similar way, Johnson and Greening (1999) and Neubaum and Zahra (2006) find that a firm’s scores on issues related to diversity, community involvement, employee relations, environmental performance and product quality are positively related to pension fund ownership but unrelated to ownership…”
• Corporate Social Responsibility in China: A Corporate Governance Approach (2014, background): “Neubaum and Zahra (2006) found that institutional ownership has a positive effect on corporate social performance.”
• Managerial Entrenchment and Corporate Social Performance (2008, result): “This association between ownership concentration and CSP found support in some recent studies (Barnea and Rubin, 2006; and Neubaum and Zahra, 2006).”
• Does Stakeholder Management have a Dark Side? (2009, background): “Neubaum and Zahra (2006) find a significant and positive relationship between long-term institutional ownership and CSP.”
• The Impact of Board Gender Diversity and Foreign Institutional Investors on the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Engagement of Chinese Listed Companies (2019, result): “Moreover, previous studies also support this view [10,69,70].”
• Corporate Social Performance: A Review of Empirical Research Examining the Corporation–Society Relationship Using Kinder, Lydenberg, Domini Social Ratings Data (2017, background): “Another Mattingly 807 study, examining activism by institutional investors but using only a composite measure of CSP, again observed that ownership structure influenced an organization’s CSP (Neubaum & Zahra, 2006).”
• Are Socially Responsible Managers Really Ethical? Exploring the Relationship between Earnings Management and Corporate Social Responsibility (2008, background): “Concomitantly, Neubaum and Zahra (2006) find that long-term institutional owners, who tend to be controlling blockholders, affect positively a firm’s CSR.”