The development of argumentive discourse skill

By Mark Felton, Deanna Kuhn. 2001

168 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/536dccb0e0b8b688d2131afafe695b60efe71811

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Argumentation for Learning: Well-Trodden Paths and Unexplored Territories (2016, background): “Premature consensus seeking (e.g., Weinberger & Fischer, 2006) and a tendency to ignore dissenting claims (Felton & Kuhn, 2001; Kuhn & Udell, 2007) are common concerns in argumentation research.”
Reasoning Serves Argumentation in Children (2011, unknown): “ (Stein & Albro, 2001, p.130).”
Developing Norms of Argumentation: Metacognitive, Epistemological, and Social Dimensions of Developing Argumentive Competence (2013, methodology): “Our earlier work (Felton & Kuhn, 2001; Kuhn & Udell, 2003; Kuhn et al., 2008) documented that young adolescents typically concentrate their attention on exposition of their own claims, essentially ignoring the opponent’s position.”
The Challenges of Scientific Literacy: From the viewpoint of second‐generation cognitive science (2006, background): “From an early age, they engage in verbal conflict in which they make claims and give reasons to support them (Stein & Albro, 2001 ).”
Why Argue? Developing Understanding of the Purposes and Values of Argumentive Discourse (2010, background): “When asked to engage in debate with a peer on a controversial topic (Felton & Kuhn, 2001), or to choose effective strategies for doing so (Kuhn & Udell, 2007), their typical approach is to introduce reasoning in support of their own claim while ignoring the opponent’s claim, appearing to believe it…”
Teaching Fourth and Fifth Graders to Evaluate Information Sources During Text Comprehension (2013, background): “This contrasts with findings from developmental research showing that younger children develop a sense of authority when assessing the legitimacy of commands (Laupa, 1991) or when reflecting on cases of conflict argumentation (e.g., “who owns the ball”; Stein & Albro, 2001).”
Self-compassion, Interpersonal Conflict Resolutions, and Well-being (2013, background): “The ability to problem solve in this balanced and constructive way is likely to enhance the quality and satisfying nature of interpersonal relationships (Gottman, 1994; Stein & Albro, 2001; Zacchilli et al., 2009).”
Examining the literacy component of science literacy: 25 years of language arts and science research (2003, background): “Brem, Russell, and Weems (2001) asked Grade 9, Grade 11, and Grade 12 students to apply the criteria of credibility, accuracy, reasonableness, and support or evidence to evaluate the scientific claims made on six websites.”