BEYOND SELF-REPORT: USING OBSERVATIONAL, PHYSIOLOGICAL, AND SITUATION-BASED MEASURES IN RESEARCH ON OCCUPATIONAL STRESS

171 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Positive Social Interactions and the Human Body at Work: Linking Organizations and Physiology (2008, background): “In addition, in order to interpret physiological measures, it is important to couple them with other kinds of data, such as self-report and observation (Semmer et al., 2004).”
The Power of Doing: How Job Crafting Transmits the Beneficial Impact of Autonomy Among Overqualified Employees (2019, unknown): “As mentioned in the introduction, using supervisor reports can eradicate typical shortcomings associated with the use of employee self-reports (Semmer et al. 2004; Spector 1992).”
Is Stress Worth it? Stress‐Related Health and Wealth Trade‐Offs for Entrepreneurs (2015, methodology): “Following Heaphy and Dutton (2008) and Semmer, Grebner, and Elfering (2004), we couple physiological data with self-report measures of stress and health.”
Work–home interference: How does it manifest itself from day to day? (2006, background): “Moreover, as Semmer, Grebner, and Elfering (2004) argue, alternative measures such as observational or physiological measures are not free of error variance either, and should therefore not be considered superior to selfreport measures.”
Work Stress and Employee Health (2013, background): “Though there is substantial overlap between event and time sampling procedures and traditional self-reports, it should not be assumed that these measures assess the same thing (Semmer et al., 2004).”