Can Middle-School Science textbooks help students learn important ideas? Findings from project 2061's curriculum evaluation study: Life Science
By Luli Stern, J. Roseman. 2004
231 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/50b14be9ebc6e00a6ef2f49078286e6b196ac15b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Marcia C. Linn
- Elizabeth A. Davis
- Carrie J. Beyer
- Christian D. Schunn
- Miray Tekkumru‐Kisa
- Kihyun Ryoo
- Mary Kay Stein
- Eugene L. Chiappetta
In Education
- Marcia C. Linn
- Carrie J. Beyer
- Elizabeth A. Davis
- Christian D. Schunn
- Miray Tekkumru‐Kisa
- Kihyun Ryoo
- Mary Kay Stein
- Eugene L. Chiappetta
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Can Dynamic Visualizations Improve Middle School Students' Understanding of Energy in Photosynthesis? (2012, background): “To fully understand photosynthesis, students must integrate the relationships between energy transformation and observable aspects of plant growth (Kesidou & Roseman, 2002; Stern & Roseman, 2004).”
- A Framework for Analyzing Cognitive Demand and Content-Practices Integration: Task Analysis Guide in Science (2015, background): “While examples of other frameworks for judging the alignment of curricula to standards exist (Kesidou & Roseman, 2002; Stern & Roseman, 2004), we are not aware of any that specifically target the integration of content and scientific practices, especially at the level of individual tasks.”
- Analysis of Five High School Biology Textbooks Used in the United States for Inclusion of the Nature of Science (2007, background): “Stern and Roseman ( 2004 ) analyzed nine middle‐level science textbooks to determine how well these instructional resources appear to support student learning of the topic “matter and energy transformation.”
- Learning to critique and adapt science curriculum materials: Examining the development of preservice elementary teachers' pedagogical content knowledge (2012, methodology): “For example, many are inconsistent with reform-based standards and practices, failing to attend to alternative ideas, provide relevant representations and phenomena, and scaffold sense-making (Beyer, Delgado, Davis, & Krajcik, 2009; Hubisz, 2003; Kesidou & Roseman, 2002; Stern & Roseman, 2004).”