Implicit stereotypes and prejudice.

By Irene V. Blair. 2001

197 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4f5909d6569d290f03179581e823eb4776206c5f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

Citations in the corpus

Implicit measures in social cognition. research: their meaning and use. (2003, background): “Blair (2001), Dovidio et al. (2001), and Brauer et al. (2000) have provided recent reviews.”
Improving Intergroup Relations in Higher Education: A Critical Examination of the Influence of Educational Interventions on Racial Bias (2004, background): “Contemporary research suggests that the expression of bias occurs both unconsciously and intentionally (Blair, 2001; Devine, 1989).”
News Selection Patterns as a Function of Race: The Discerning Minority and the Indiscriminating Majority (2008, background): “Studies using implicit measures, for example, have shown that racial biases can exit even among people who claim they are not prejudiced (e.g., Blair, 2001; Greenwald & Banaji, 1995).”
How Dissociated Are Implicit and Explicit Racial Attitudes? A Bogus Pipeline Approach (2005, background): “Another explanation for the weak implicit– explicit link, which Blair (2001) called the representational perspective, holds that implicit and explicit attitudes are independent cognitive representations that are the result of different psychological processes.”
Implicit bias in impression formation: associations influence the construal of individuating information (2003, methodology): “Fazio, Jackson, Dunton, & Williams, 1995; Greenwald, McGhee, & Schwartz, 1998; Wittenbrink, Judd, & Park, 1997; for reviews see Blair, 2001; Dovidio, Kawakami, & Beach, 2001). Hence, it is not clear whether Lepore and Brown’s (1997) results are actually due to a differential activation of negative a”
The regulation of explicit and implicit race bias: the role of motivations to respond without prejudice. (2002, background): “…bias is assessed with implicit measures, which theoretically bypass conscious control, bias is often observed even among those who claim to be nonprejudiced (e.g., Blair, 2001; Devine, 1989; Fazio, Jackson, Dunton, & Williams, 1995; Greenwald & Banaji, 1995; Greenwald, McGhee, & Schwartz, 1998).”
Imagining stereotypes away: the moderation of implicit stereotypes through mental imagery. (2001, background): “Over the past decade, substantial evidence has accumulated for the influence of implicit stereotypes on judgment and behavior (for reviews, see Bargh, 1999; Blair, 2001; Greenwald & Banaji, 1995).”
Social Justice in Our Minds, Homes, and Society: The Nature, Causes, and Consequences of Implicit Bias (2004, unknown): “Blair, I. V. (2001).”
Paved with good intentions: do public health and human service providers contribute to racial/ethnic disparities in health? (2003, background): “Finally, although social categorization is an automatic and dominant information-processing strategy, recent reviews of the evidence suggest that some of the associated processes may be controllable in certain circumstances.(82,87) These reviews point to the crucial influence of 3 broad categories o”
The Confronting Prejudiced Responses (CPR) Model: Applying CPR in Organizations (2008, background): “Given that the expression of prejudice often occurs automatically, with little intent (for a review, see Blair, 2001), it may be surprising that we discuss confrontation via a step model, thereby suggesting a more controlled process.”
The Reliability of Implicit Stereotyping (2001, methodology): “controlled) responses with supraliminal presentations (Blair & Banaji, 1996; Neely, 1977, 1991). These 4.85 × 3.75-in. photographs, which were obtained with permission from college yearbooks, were presented until the participant responded.(1) In accordance with strategies used by Kawakami et al. (19”
Implicit stereotypes and women ’ s math performance : How implicit gender-math stereotypes in X uence women ’ s susceptibility to stereotype threat (2005, unknown): “Reports are mixed as to whether and when implicit cognition corresponds to explicit cognition (Blair, 2001; Cunningham , Preacher, & Banaji, 2001).”
A Meta-Analysis on the Correlation Between the Implicit Association Test and Explicit Self-Report Measures (2005, background): “…are difficult to tap with self-reports is implied by the finding that implicit measures often show rather low correlations with explicit measures (Blair, 2001; Dovidio, Kawakami, & Beach, 2001) yet reliably predict behavior (e.g., Asendorpf, Banse, & Mücke, 2002; Dovidio, Kawakami, Johnson,…”