A Meta-Analysis on the Correlation Between the Implicit Association Test and Explicit Self-Report Measures

1,639 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

When Teams Agree While Disagreeing: Reflexion and Reflection in Shared Cognition (2015, result): “consistent with findings from similar studies in social psychology (Hofmann et al., 2005).”
High self-esteem buffers negative feedback: Once more with feeling (2010, background): “Several researchers have considered this issue and concluded that implicit attitude measures more reliably assess affective associations than cognitive ones (Gawronski & Bodenhausen, 2006 ; Hofmann, Gawronski, Gschwendner, Le, & Schmitt, 2005 ; Hofmann, Gschwendner, Nosek, & Schmitt, 2005 ).”
Long-term reduction in implicit race bias: A prejudice habit-breaking intervention (2012, positive): “TheIATis a dual-categorization task that has good psychometric properties (Cunningham, Preacher, & Banaji, 2001; Hofmann et al., 2005) and is linked to basic neural and affective processes relevant to implicit race bias (Cunningham, Raye, & Johnson, 2004; Phelps et al., 2000).”
The Best Way to Measure Explicit Racial Attitudes Is to Ask About Them (2018, background): “Indeed, meta-analyses have found that increased conceptual correspondence between measures was associated with larger correlations between implicit and explicit attitudes (Hofmann et al., 2005) and between implicit attitudes and behavior (Greenwald, Poehlman, Uhlmann, & Banaji, 2009).”