Implicit bias in impression formation: associations influence the construal of individuating information

By Bertram Gawronski, Daniel Geschke, R. Banse. 2003

148 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b691ee332ce4460f5a768479f34e4951f4ab7272

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

When and why do implicit measures predict behaviour? Empirical evidence for the moderating role of opportunity, motivation, and process reliance (2008, methodology): “The authors used an IAT as an implicit measure and evaluative rating scales as well as a measure of the MCPR (Banse & Gawronski, 2003 ; Dunton & Fazio, 1997 ) as additional predictors.”
Implicit Ingroup Favoritism, Outgroup Favoritism, and Their Behavioral Manifestations (2004, background): “…that implicit prejudice toward Turks not only made people render negative evaluations of a Turkish person’s current behavior, but it also led them to make more definitive dispositional attributions about that person’s future actions than they did when the person was German (Gawronski et al., 2003).”
The Implicit Prejudiced Attitudes of Teachers (2010, background): “Gawronski, Geschke, and Banse (2003) have argued that prejudicerelated evaluative associations may have a self-confirming character and thus lead the perceiver to see what he or she already has in mind.”
Explicit Evidence on the Import of Implicit Attitudes: The IAT and Immigration Policy Judgments (2010, background): “…including political preferences (e.g., Albertson 2008; Olson and Fazio 2004), views toward racial and sexual orientation minorities (Lyle 2008; Jellison et al. 2004; Gawronski et al. 2003), consumer tastes (Maison et al. 2004), and personal reactions to failure (Greenwald and Farnham 2000).”
Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: an integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. (2006, background): “For instance, with regard to Gawronski and Strack’s (2004) finding that cognitive dissonance changed only explicit but not implicit attitudes, one could object that the reliability of the implicit measure might have been low, thus undermining significant effects on this measure.”