How Dissociated Are Implicit and Explicit Racial Attitudes? A Bogus Pipeline Approach

By J. Nier. 2005

90 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

What moderates implicit—explicit consistency? (2005, methodology): “A recent study (Nier, 2005) adopted the bogus pipeline paradigm (Jones & Sigall, 1971) and suggested to participants in one condition that the IAT was a valid, non-fakeable procedure for the assessment of prejudice.”
Ten Frequently Asked Questions About Implicit Measures and Their Frequently Supposed, But Not Entirely Correct Answers (2009, background): “Based on their lower susceptibility to faking, another common assumption about implicit measures is that they can be used as some kind of lie detector when a person is not willing to reveal a particular opinion or belief (e.g., Nier, 2005; Sartori, Agosta, Zogmaister, Ferrara, & Castiello, 2008).”
Unconscious Racism: A Concept in Pursuit of a Measure (2008, background): “Similarly, implicit measures might unobtrusively activate attitudes that can be consciously perceived (see Nier 2005).”
Understanding patterns of attitude change: When implicit measures show change, but explicit measures do not ☆ (2008, background): “However, there is surprisingly little research that employed an experimental approach (for notable exceptions, see Gawronski & Strack, 2004; Nier, 2005).”