Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions ☆

By Manuel Perea, Stephen Lupker. 2004

398 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4f3bd4418994f7f70c65ca118a3f1f58072b1352

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

Citations in the corpus

The Bayesian reader: explaining word recognition as an optimal Bayesian decision process. (2006, background): “The assumptions that all letters are equally confusable, and that letter representations are positionspecific , are unlikely to be an accurate characterisation of human perception (Chambers, 1979; O'Connor & Forster, 1981; Perea & Lupker, 2003, 2004).”
BuscaPalabras: A program for deriving orthographic and phonological neighborhood statistics and other psycholinguistic indices in Spanish (2005, background): “Empirical work has shown that transposed-letter similarity affects performance in a variety of reading tasks, including lexical decision, naming, and semantic categorization (e.g., Andrews, 1996; Chambers, 1979; Perea & Carreiras, in press; Perea & Lupker, 2003, 2004; Taft & van Graan, 1998).”
Watching the Word Go by: On the Time-course of Component Processes in Visual Word Recognition (2009, methodology): “We then turn to examine the evidence from recent electrophysiological research that provides timing estimates for these different component processes.”
The Overlap Model: A Model of Letter Position Coding (2008, neutral): “Perea and Lupker (2004) found sizeable masked priming effects from transposed-letter nonwords to the words from which they were created when two noncontiguous interior letters were transposed (e.g., caniso–casino vs. caviro–casino).”
Transposed-letter effects: Consonants, vowels and letter frequency (2008, methodology): “These results argue against the possibility that the differences observed by Perea and Lupker (2004) can be attributed to factors that are specific to Spanish stimuli, such as the nature of Spanish’s syllabic structure or the nature of its letter-sound correspondences.”
The spatial coding model of visual word identification. (2010, neutral): “…Van Assche, & van Heuven, 2006; Guerrera & Forster, 2008; Johnson, 2007; Johnson & Dunne, 20xx; Johnson, Perea, & Rayner, 2007; Kinoshita & Norris, 2008, 2009; Lupker & Davis, 2009; Perea & Carreiras, 2006a, 2006b; Perea & Lupker, 2003a, 2003b, 2004; ; White, Johnson, Liversedge, & Rayner, 2008).”
The effects of inter-letter spacing in visual-word recognition: Evidence with young normal readers and developmental dyslexics (2012, background): “…Furthermore, a small increase of inter-letter spacing may not just reduce the effect of crowding, it may also aid in the process of letter position coding: if letter position coding were not attained, we could not distinguish between words like casual and causal (see Perea & Lupker, 2003, 2004).”
Robsut Wrod Reocginiton via Semi-Character Recurrent Neural Network (2016, background): “…word (e.g. gadren-GARDEN) facilitates primes as large as identity primes (garden-GARDEN) and these results have been con-ﬁrmed in cases where the transposed letters are not adjacent (caniso-CASINO) (Perea and Lupker 2004) and even more extreme cases (sdiwelak-SIDEWALK) (Guerrera and Forster 2008).”
Beyond single syllables: large-scale modeling of reading aloud with the Connectionist Dual Process (CDP++) model. (2010, background): “One crucial piece of information used in grapheme parsing is the number of vowel graphemes in the letter string (see e.g., Lupker, Perea, and Davis (2008) and Perea and Lupker (2004) for evidence that consonant–vowel identity is available very early in processing).”
Theories of reading should predict reading speed (2012, neutral): “Thru but not wisht: Language, writing, and universal reading theory doi:10.1017/S0140525X12000234”
Cracking the orthographic code: An introduction (2008, methodology): “This TLpriming effect was replicated and extended by Perea and Lupker (2003, 2004) using double-substitution primes as controls, and TL priming effects have also been found more recently with the parafoveal preview technique (Johnson, Perea, & Rayner, 2007).”
A stimulus sampling theory of letter identity and order (2010, background): “We know this from a number of experiments (e.g., Perea & Lupker, 2004; Schoonbaert & Grainger, 2004) that have shown that word recognition is facilitated when words are primed by letter strings that contain the same letters, but in a different order.”