Theories of reading should predict reading speed
By Denis G. Pelli, Susana T. L. Chung, Gordon E. Legge. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2012
327 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Abstract A universal property of visual word identification is position-invariant letter identification, such that the letter “A” is coded in the same way in CAT and ACT. This should provide a fundamental constraint on theories of word identification, and, indeed, it inspired some of the theories that Frost has criticized. I show how the spatial coding scheme of Colin Davis (2010) can, in principle, account for contrasting transposed letter (TL) priming effects, and at the same time, position-invariant letter identification.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2fb8706e1086ee260b5c2de48c13fb7c1a3e7d7b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Ludo Verhoeven
- Harald Baayen
- Kyle C. Levesque
- Ton Dijkstra
- Kimberley Mulder
- Hélène Deacon
- Helen L. Breadmore
- Rob Schreuder
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Ludo Verhoeven
- Harald Baayen
- Kyle C. Levesque
- Hélène Deacon
- Helen L. Breadmore
- Ton Dijkstra
- Kimberley Mulder
- Rob Schreuder
Citations in the corpus
- Effects of primary and secondary morphological family size in monolingual and bilingual word processing (2014, background): “For simulation studies with naive discrimination learning addressing the crucial importance of language-specific distributional properties for understanding cross-linguistic differences in the effects of letter transpositions, see Baayen (2013) in respons to Frost (2012).”
- Universals in Learning to Read Across Languages and Writing Systems (2021, background): “A particularly strong hypothesis by Frost (2012) is that each language has its optimal writing system.”
- How morphology impacts reading and spelling: advancing the role of morphology in models of literacy development (2020, background): “For starters, there is a consensus that morphology is central in the organization of the mental lexicon across languages (Frost, 2012; Lehtonen & Bryant, 2005; Sandra, 1994).”