The spatial coding model of visual word identification.

By Colin J. Davis. Psychology Review, 2010

480 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Bayesian just-so stories in psychology and neuroscience. (2012, background): “In a more recent article, Norris et al. (2010) advocated a coding scheme similar to the spatial coding model (Davis, 2010) in order to recognize familiar words in novel contexts (e.g., CAT in the TREECAT), as well as various behavioral results that reveal the perceptual similarity of words that…”
The effects of inter-letter spacing in visual-word recognition: Evidence with young normal readers and developmental dyslexics (2012, background): “When examining the readability of textbooks for children, Woods, Davis, and Scharff (2005) indicated the following: “Publishing companies have guidelines, but these are often based on font types and sizes most frequently used by other publishing companies rather than on empirical data” (p.”
Beyond Phonics: The Case for Teaching Children the Logic of the English Spelling System (2017, methodology): “This includes the dual route cascaded model (Coltheart et al., 2001), the connectionist dual process model (Perry, Ziegler, & Zorzi, 2007), as well as the interactive activation model (McClelland & Rumelhart, 1981) and the spatial coding model (Davis, 2010), among many others.”