The Overlap Model: A Model of Letter Position Coding

By Pablo Gómez, Roger Ratcliff, Manuel Perea. Psychology Review, 2008

410 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Recent research has shown that letter identity and letter position are not integral perceptual dimensions (e.g., jugde primes judge in word-recognition experiments). Most comprehensive computational models of visual word recognition (e.g., the interactive activation model, J. L. McClelland & D. E. Rumelhart, 1981, and its successors) assume that the position of each letter within a word is perfectly encoded. Thus, these models are unable to explain the presence of effects of letter transposition (trial-trail), letter migration (beard-bread), repeated letters (moose-mouse), or subset/superset effects (faulty-faculty). The authors extend R. Ratcliff's (1981) theory of order relations for encoding of letter positions and show that the model can successfully deal with these effects. The basic assumption is that letters in the visual stimulus have distributions over positions so that the representation of one letter will extend into adjacent letter positions. To test the model, the authors conducted a series of forced-choice perceptual identification experiments. The overlap model produced very good fits to the empirical data, and even a simplified 2-parameter model was capable of producing fits for 104 observed data points with a correlation coefficient of .91.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/13280e57c8e593bdddf2df1846334c05c90f836f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

  1. Colin J. Davis
  2. Manuel Perea
  3. M. Casteren
  4. Sachiko Kinoshita
  5. Dennis Norris
  6. Pablo Gómez
  7. Carmen Moret-Tatay
  8. Victoria Panadero

In Statistics and Probability

  1. Colin J. Davis
  2. Dennis Norris
  3. Sachiko Kinoshita
  4. M. Casteren
  5. Manuel Perea
  6. Pablo Gómez

Citations in the corpus