Good and Guilt-Free: The Role of Self-Accountability in Influencing Preferences for Products with Ethical Attributes
By J. Peloza, K. White, Jingzhi Shang. 2013
546 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Information Systems and Management, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4e7bab5dd9e69f76ce9ab26c16001f6584695d24
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
In Information Systems and Management
- Paolo Antonetti
- Stan Maklan
- K. White
- J. T. Pursell
- L. Ferrell
- Raymond J. Harbert
- M. Kumar
- O. C. Ferrella
In Social Psychology
- K. White
- Paolo Antonetti
- M. Kumar
- Joseph F. Hair
- Thomas Allard
- K. Winterich
- Gergana Y. Nenkov
- M. Luchs
Citations in the corpus
- “Yes, but this Other One Looks Better/Works Better”: How do Consumers Respond to Trade-offs Between Sustainability and Other Valued Attributes? (2015, background): “For example, it is easier to justify the choice of a more utilitarian product over a more hedonic product (Kivetz and Simonson 2002), in part due to the greater guilt associated with choosing hedonic value over utilitarian value (O’Curry and Strahilevitz 2001; Peloza et al. 2012; Strahilevitz and My”
- Feelings that Make a Difference: How Guilt and Pride Convince Consumers of the Effectiveness of Sustainable Consumption Choices (2014, background): “Scholars have studied the role of anticipated guilt and regret (Carrus et al. 2008, Grob 1995; Kaiser 2006; Peloza et al. 2013), feelings of empathy toward others (Granzin and Olsen 1991) or toward the natural environment (Mayer and Frantz 2004; Nisbet et al.”
- Knowing What It Makes: How Product Transformation Salience Increases Recycling (2019, background): “…has shown that evoking the positive social emotion of pride can increase the likelihood of engaging in sustainable behavior (Peter and Honea 2012), at least relative to guilt-inducing messages (Antonetti and Maklan 2014; Bissing-Olson, Fielding, and Iyer 2016; Peloza, White, and Shang 2013).”
- Business ethics, corporate social responsibility, and brand attitudes: An exploratory study (2019, background): “First, there is research about attitudes toward ethical products (Peloza et al., 2013) and ethical consumption (Davies & Gutsche, 2016).”
- Cross-Domain Effects of Guilt on Desire for Self-Improvement Products (2015, background): “Past research suggests that the appraisal of self (Higgins 1987; Miceli and Castelfranchi 1998; Peloza, White, and Shang 2013; Tracy and Robins 2004).”