Field Investigation of the Relationship among Adult Curiosity, Workplace Learning, and Job Performance. [and] Invited Reaction: Relationship among Adult Curiosity, Workplace Learning, and Job…
By Thomas G. Reio Jr., A. Wiswell, R. Rowden. 2000
202 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4d731593f564ef0c13817ce3dde24bafc0962158
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Emily M. Grossnickle
- Rajashi Ghosh
- H. Bang
- Thomas G. Reio Jr.
- Jamie L. Callahan
- E. G. Peterson
- J. Cohen
- Christopher P. Cerasoli
Citations in the corpus
- Reducing turnover intent: supervisor and co-worker incivility and socialization-related learning (2013, methodology): “Lack of such information can severely deter employees from initiating supportive relationships that can increase their learning and subsequent attachment to the organization (Reio and Wiswell 2000; Schein 1988).”
- Workplace learning strategies, barriers, facilitators and outcomes: a qualitative study among human resource management practitioners (2011, background): “Outcomes are those things that occur as a result of the actual workplace learning and are important because they positively affect job performance (Reio and Wiswell 2000).”
- Disentangling Curiosity: Dimensionality, Definitions, and Distinctions from Interest in Educational Contexts (2014, background): “…recent educational research has focused on the development of curiosity measures applicable to educational investigations (Kashdan et al. 2009; Litman and Jimerson 2004; Woods-Groves et al. 2009) and has examined curiosity as it relates to learning (Kashdan and Yuen 2007; Reio and Wiswell 2000).”
- Antecedents and Outcomes of Informal Learning Behaviors: a Meta-Analysis (2018, background): “The predispositions category also includes other semi-stable, trait-like individual differences such as adaptability (Mumford, Baughman, Threlfall, Uhlman, & Costanza, 1993) and curiosity (Reio & Wiswell, 2000).”
- Affect, Curiosity, and Socialization-Related Learning: A Path Analysis of Antecedents to Job Performance (2004, methodology): “The data presented in this paper is part of a larger study of workplace learning ( Reio & Wiswell, 2000 ).”
- Introducing the construct curiosity for predicting job performance (2013, background): “Regarding discriminant validity, epistemic curiosity is hardly related to sensation seeking (Zuckerman, 1994), correlations range between .02 and .27 (Litman & Spielberger, 2003; Reio & Wiswell, 2000), and corresponding measures load on different factors when factor-analyzed (Vidler & Rawan, 1974).”
- A Case for Domain-Specific Curiosity in Mathematics (2019, background): “Students who report feeling curiousmore often (i.e., high trait curiosity) have better academic outcomes than students who report lower overall curiosity (i.e., low trait curiosity) (Reio and Wiswell 2000; Wavo 2004).”
- The Impact of Role Assignment on Knowledge Construction in Asynchronous Discussion Groups (2005, background): “A total of 25% of the final score for the course was based on the quality of individual student participation in the electronic discussion groups.”