Affect, Curiosity, and Socialization-Related Learning: A Path Analysis of Antecedents to Job Performance

By Thomas G. Reio Jr., Jamie L. Callahan. 2004

194 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/294e2f9687446d20da9b415d2cf44bb62d58d77c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Emily M. Grossnickle
2. Rajashi Ghosh
3. H. Bang
4. Thomas G. Reio Jr.
5. Tonette S. Rocco

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Emily M. Grossnickle
2. Thomas G. Reio Jr.
3. Rajashi Ghosh
4. H. Bang
5. Tonette S. Rocco
6. Carlos A. Albornoz
7. M. Shuck
8. B. Shuck

In Social Psychology

1. Emily M. Grossnickle
2. Tonette S. Rocco
3. Rajashi Ghosh
4. H. Bang
5. Carlos A. Albornoz
6. Thomas G. Reio Jr.
7. M. Shuck
8. B. Shuck

Citations in the corpus

• Exploring Employee Engagement from the Employee Perspective: Implications for HRD. (2011, background): “While other researchers have suggested that personality variables such as curiosity (Reio and Callahan, 2004; Reio et al., 2006), optimism, self-efficacy (Macey and Schneider, 2008; Saks, 2006), self-esteem and coping style (Rothmann and Storm, 2003; Rothmann, 2003; Xanthopoulou et al.”
• Reducing turnover intent: supervisor and co-worker incivility and socialization-related learning (2013, methodology): “Positive, satisfactory socialization-related learning efforts can subsequently promote workplace adaptation and, in the end, result in positive organizational outcomes such as reduced turnover (Reio and Callahan 2004).”
• Disentangling Curiosity: Dimensionality, Definitions, and Distinctions from Interest in Educational Contexts (2014, methodology): “Trait and state curiosity are not viewed as incompatible, and they have been found to be significantly related, with correlations ranging from .24 (Litman et al. 2005a) to .5 (Kashdan and Roberts 2004) and as high as .78 (Reio and Callahan 2004).”